Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
Published on: December 2, 2022
Dissociating effector and movement direction selection during the preparation of manual reaching movements: evidence
Elena Gherri1, José Van Velzen, Martin Eimer
1School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK. e.gherri@psychology.bbk.ac.uk
Objective:
The present study investigated whether lateralized ERP components triggered during covert manual response preparation (ADAN, LDAP) reflect effector selection, the selection of movement direction, or both.
Methods:
Event-related brain potentials were recorded during a response precueing paradigm where visual cues provided either partial (Experiment 1) or full (Experiment 2) information about the response hand and the direction for a subsequent reaching movement.
Results:
ADAN and LDAP components were elicited even when only partial response information was available, demonstrating that they do not require the presence of a fully specified motor program. The ADAN was elicited in a similar fashion regardless of whether effector or movement direction information was provided, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms are equally sensitive to both types of response-related information. In contrast, the LDAP was larger in response to cues providing effector information, but was also reliably present when movement direction was available.
Conclusions:
ADAN and LDAP components reflect preparatory activity within anterior and posterior parts of the parieto-premotor sensorimotor network where different parameters for manual reaching movements are programmed independently.
Significance:
These results support the claim of the premotor theory of attention that shared sensorimotor control mechanisms are involved in attention and motor programming.
