Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Characterization of Inflammatory Responses During Intranasal Colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae
Published on: January 17, 2014
Tackling the anterior nares and other sites of colonization: implications for the dermatologist
James Q Del Rosso1, Dirk M Elston
1University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, USA.
Abstract:
Persistent Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage has been identified in patients with S aureus infections, but the effectiveness of decolonization in decreasing the risk of infection has been met with variable success, partly due to the inconsistent efficacy of topical agents such as mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate in clearing S aureus carriage. Furthermore, although decolonization would seem to be a logical means to reduce the incidence of infection, the data supporting eradication of S aureus nasal colonization as a prophylactic are equivocal. Resistance to topical antibacterial agents has been reported. These factors, combined with the potential correlation of nasal colonization to clinical infection, warrant the careful use of topical and systemic antibacterial agents to reduce the chance of resistance, thereby maximizing their usefulness in treating infection.
Related Concept Videos
Microbiota of the Respiratory Tract
The Oral Microbiota
The Skin Microbiota
Colonisation of Pathogens
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...