Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Active adaptive management for conservation.

Michael A McCarthy1, Hugh P Possingham

  • 1Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne c/- The School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia. mamcca@unimelb.edu.au

Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|July 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

Synergies between disease and urbanization drive the decline of threatened amphibian metapopulations.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

How monitoring matters for nature conservation: 15 reasons framed in a theory of change.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Multiple-use spatial planning for sustainable development and conservation.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Contribution of microcosm experiments to conservation science.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2025
Same author

The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia's priority threatened species.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Extreme site fidelity in long-distance migratory shorebirds in Australia and potential implications for conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

When everything is violence, nothing is violence: Response to Koot et al. (2020).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

Key agroecosystems for the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Europe.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same journal

What climate adaptation can learn from evolutionary adaptation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study optimizes management decisions by balancing learning and action under uncertainty. It develops a framework for adaptive management, crucial for ecological system preservation.

Area of Science:

  • Ecological Management
  • Decision Science
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Active adaptive management integrates management needs with system learning for improved decision-making.
  • Quantifying the value of information gain versus immediate optimal decisions remains challenging.
  • Existing frameworks often struggle to balance uncertainty and learning in management strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for optimizing management decisions that incorporate both uncertainty and learning through adaptive management.
  • To provide a quantitative approach for allocating resources in ecological management.
  • To inform strategies for managing ecological systems effectively in uncertain environments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Bayesian updating to refine probabilities of success for management options.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal multi-year management strategies.
  • Modeled resource allocation with discrete management units, binary outcomes (success/failure), and budget constraints.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimal budget allocation was influenced by costs, certainty levels, and management timeframe.
    • The choice of management objective significantly impacted the optimal decision-making strategy.
    • A case study on revegetation at Merri Creek demonstrated the practical application of the approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed approach provides a robust method for optimizing management decisions in ecological systems.
    • Integrating uncertainty and learning is key to effective adaptive management.
    • This framework aids in making informed, strategic decisions for conservation and resource management.