Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
Published on: June 23, 2026
Comparative QSAR modeling of COX-2 inhibitor 1,2-diarylimidazoles using E-state and physicochemical parameters
Santanu Chakraborty1, Chandana Sengupta, Kunal Roy
1Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Lab, Division of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India.
Abstract:
Considering importance of developing selective COX-2 inhibitors, COX-2 binding affinity data of 4-(2-aryl-1-imidazolyl)-phenyl methyl sulfones and sulfonamides (n = 83) have been modeled using electrotopological state (E-state) index as electronic parameter, hydrophobic substituent constant (pi) and molar refractivity (MR) of aryl ring substituents as lipophilic and steric parameters, respectively. Additionally, suitable dummy parameters have been used for the development of multiple regression equations in a stepwise manner. The study suggests that lipophilicity of ortho, meta and para substituents of the aryl ring increases the binding affinity, while molar refractivity (MR) of ortho and meta substituents of the aryl ring decreases the binding affinity. Again, electron-withdrawing substituents at meta and para positions of the aryl ring increase the binding affinity. Additionally, a 4-fluoro substituent on the aryl ring, a trifluoromethyl substituent at R position and simultaneous presence of 3-chloro and 4-methyl groups on the aryl ring are conducive to the binding affinity. Also, an amino substituent is preferred over a methyl group at R2 position suggesting preference of the sulfonamide moiety over the methyl sulfone moiety for the COX-2 binding affinity. Furthermore, importance of E-state values of different atoms in the generated relations suggests the influence of electron density distribution over the 1,2-diarylimidazole nucleus for the binding affinity. For this data set, E-state parameters perform better as electronic parameters in comparison to Hammett sigma parameters. When lipophilic whole molecular descriptor (ClogP) is used, instead of hydrophobic substituent constant (pi), the former performs better than the latter.
More Related Videos
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model