Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Limits of event-related potential differences in tracking object processing speed.

Guillaume A Rousselet1, Marc J-M Macé, Simon J Thorpe

  • 1Université Toulouse 3. g.rousselet@psy.gla.ac.uk

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|July 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seeing Avatars During Social Interaction in VR May Enhance Inter-Brain Synchronization.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Using Simulations to Explore Sampling Distributions: An Antidote to Hasty and Extravagant Inferences.

eNeuro·2025
Same author

Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Bias in data-driven replicability analysis of univariate brain-wide association studies.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Using cluster-based permutation tests to estimate MEG/EEG onsets: How bad is it?

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Towards electrophysiological measurement of presence in virtual reality through auditory oddball stimuli.

Journal of neural engineering·2024

Human faces are processed faster than animal faces, even when physical differences are minimal. Event-related potential (ERP) differences emerge earlier for faces, suggesting distinct processing speeds.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Object recognition involves rapid visual processing.
  • Human faces and animals are evolutionarily significant categories.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to measure neural processing speed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the processing speed of human faces and animal categories using behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
  • To investigate whether early event-related potential (ERP) differences reflect category-specific processing speeds.
  • To examine the influence of image inversion and physical similarity on category processing.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using brief presentations of upright/inverted natural scenes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects categorized images of animals vs. human faces at different scales and close-up views.
  • Behavioral reaction times and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Behavioral performance and reaction times were similar for animal and human face categories.
    • Early ERP differences emerged sooner for human faces (around 100 msec) compared to animals (around 150 msec), even when physical differences were minimized.
    • Task-dependent ERP differences showed surprisingly long latencies, not correlating with behavioral processing speed.

    Conclusions:

    • Human faces elicit earlier neural processing differences than animal categories, suggesting category-specific processing speeds.
    • Task-dependent ERPs may not accurately capture object processing speed for categories like faces.
    • Further research is needed to refine models of object recognition and processing speed.