Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automatic texture segmentation in early vision: evidence from priming experiments.

Anna Schubö1, Cristina Meinecke

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Leopoldstr. 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany. anna.schuboe@lmu.de

Vision Research
|July 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effort expectation and strategic cue use in visual search.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025
Same author

Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.

iScience·2025
Same author

Attention directs actions in visual foraging.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Cueing distractors is effective when the incentive to suppress is high.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Trade-off between search costs and accuracy in oculomotor and manual search tasks.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Effects of color-enhancing filters on color salience in normal trichromats.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Even when textures are briefly presented and masked, they are automatically segmented. This automatic texture segmentation influences later processing, even if participants cannot consciously perceive the textures.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Texture segmentation is typically considered a rapid, automatic visual process.
  • Naive participants often fail explicit texture identification with brief, masked stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if automatic texture segmentation occurs even with brief, masked stimuli.
  • To determine if this segmentation influences subsequent cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a priming paradigm to indirectly measure texture processing.
  • Assessed influence on imperative stimulus processing.
  • Recorded lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to measure response activation.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Found significant priming effects for both experienced and naive participants.
  • Naive participants showed priming despite inability to perform explicit forced-choice tasks.
  • Lateralized readiness potential (LRP) analysis indicated no automatic response activation.

Conclusions:

  • Automatic texture segmentation occurs even under conditions of brief presentation and masking.
  • Evidence supports automatic visual processing without conscious awareness or overt response.
  • Priming effects demonstrate implicit processing of segmented textures.