Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of uncontrollability and failure on the development of learned helplessness in perceptual-motor tasks.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2000
Same author

Learned helplessness: a survey of cognitive, motivational and perceptual-motor consequences in motor tasks.

Journal of sports sciences·1999
Same author

What does keeping one's eye on the ball mean?

Ergonomics·1988
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
06:36

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

Published on: June 11, 2019

Naturalistic decision-making in expert badminton players.

A C Macquet1, P Fleurance

  • 1Institut National du Sport et de l'Education Physique, Paris, France. anne-claire.macquest@insep.fr

Ergonomics
|July 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Expert badminton players make strategic decisions under pressure, focusing on maintaining rallies, gaining advantage, or ending points. Key tactics include pressuring opponents and adapting actions based on real-time information.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
06:36

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

Published on: June 11, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Expert athletes often make rapid decisions under pressure.
  • Understanding these decisions is crucial for performance.
  • Badminton involves complex, time-sensitive tactical choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate naturalistic decision-making in expert badminton players.
  • To identify intentions and decisions during match rallies.
  • To explore the link between information and decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Study involved two male badminton teams.
  • Data collected using self-confrontation interviews.
  • Inductive data analysis applied to interview transcripts.

Main Results:

  • Identified three rally intentions: maintain, advantage, finish.
  • Revealed eight decision types, including pressure, surprise, and observation.
  • Pressuring the opponent was a frequent decision.
  • Specific information was linked to distinct decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Expert badminton players utilize diverse strategies and decisions.
  • Decision-making is influenced by available information and knowledge.
  • Findings align with naturalistic decision-making research in sports.