Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Plant proteome analysis: a 2006 update.

Jesús V Jorrín1, Ana M Maldonado, Ma Angeles Castillejo

  • 1Agricultural and Plant Biochemistry Research Group-Plant Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain. bf1jonoj@uco.es

Proteomics
|July 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative proteomic analysis of BTH and BABA-induced resistance in pea (Pisum sativum) toward infection with pea rust (Uromyces pisi).

Journal of proteomics·2012
Same author

Proteomic analysis by two-dimensional differential in gel electrophoresis (2D DIGE) of the early response of Pisum sativum to Orobanche crenata.

Journal of experimental botany·2011
Same author

Two-dimensional electrophoresis based proteomic analysis of the pea (Pisum sativum) in response to Mycosphaerella pinodes.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2010
Same author

Combined proteomic and transcriptomic analysis identifies differentially expressed pathways associated to Pinus radiata needle maturation.

Journal of proteome research·2010
Same author

Differences in the triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) flag leaf 2-DE protein profile between varieties and nitrogen fertilization levels.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2010
Same author

Differential expression proteomics to investigate responses and resistance to Orobanche crenata in Medicago truncatula.

BMC genomics·2009
Same journal

Exoproteome Remodeling by the BraI/R Quorum Sensing Circuit and Interspecies Competition in Paraburkholderia.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Identification of Novel Interacting Proteins of FUZ and GPR161.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Light-Induced Proteomic Changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Decade-Resolved Proteomic Profiling of Gastric Cancer FFPE Archives: Evaluating Storage-Associated Shifts and Signal Stability Over 50 Years.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Proteome-Scale Mining of Metal-Associated Proteins of Monkeypox Virus.

Proteomics·2026
Same journal

Optimized Sample Handling Minimizes Peptide Adsorption to Plastics to Enable High Sensitivity Evosep Based Chemical Proteomics.

Proteomics·2026
See all related articles

Plant proteomics has seen quantitative growth but not qualitative advancement. Key challenges in technology and methodology hinder the full exploitation of proteomics in plant biology research.

Area of Science:

  • Plant biology
  • Proteomics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • This review updates the contribution of proteomics to plant biology based on 2006 research.
  • Previous updates were published in Proteomics in 2004 and 2006.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of plant proteomics research published in 2006.
  • To identify trends, methodologies, and challenges in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of nearly 100 original research papers from 2006.
  • Focus on proteomic analysis of various plant species, organs, tissues, and subcellular fractions.
  • Review of methodologies, including 2-DE (IEF-SDS-PAGE) coupled to MS, and emerging techniques.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative, but not qualitative, progress in plant proteomics.
  • Arabidopsis thaliana and rice are the most studied species.
  • Proteomic studies covered development, hormone signaling, symbionts, and stresses.
  • 2-DE coupled to MS remains the dominant methodology.
  • Advanced techniques like MudPIT, DIGE, ICAT, iTRAQ, and SILAC are underutilized.

Conclusions:

  • The full potential of plant proteomics is yet to be realized.
  • Technological challenges need to be addressed for significant advancements.
  • Continued research is essential to overcome limitations and expand applications.