Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Second thoughts on living wills.

J A Robertson1

  • 1School of Law, University of Texas, Austin.

The Hastings Center Report
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Advance directives like living wills offer future control but can hide conflicts between a patient's wishes and their later best interests when they become incompetent. These documents may hinder caregivers from assessing quality of life for incapacitated patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remarks on Iritis.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Remarks on Amaurosis, with Cases.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Sleep disturbance in patients taking opioid medication for chronic back pain.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Renewal of Menstruation and Subsequent Pregnancy after Removal of Both Ovaries.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Physicians rally against threat of a nuclear epidemic.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Chalk river nuclear laboratories.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Advance directives, including living wills, are legal documents enabling individuals to express future healthcare preferences.
  • These directives aim to uphold patient autonomy and self-determination in medical decision-making.
  • Potential conflicts arise when a patient's previously stated wishes clash with their current best interests due to diminished capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the complexities and potential drawbacks of advance directives, specifically living wills.
  • To examine how advance directives may obscure conflicts between a patient's competent wishes and their later, incompetent interests.
  • To investigate the impact of advance directives on caregivers' evaluation of a patient's quality of life.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual analysis of legal and ethical frameworks surrounding advance directives.
  • Review of case studies illustrating conflicts between patient wishes and best interests.
  • Ethical deliberation on the role of caregivers in assessing quality of life for incompetent patients.

Main Results:

  • Advance directives can create a false sense of control while masking underlying ethical dilemmas.
  • They may inadvertently shield caregivers from the difficult task of evaluating quality of life for incapacitated patients.
  • The competent wishes documented may not align with the best interests of the patient when they are unable to communicate.

Conclusions:

  • Advance directives require careful consideration of their potential to obscure complex patient interests.
  • Ethical assessment of a patient's best interests by caregivers remains crucial, even with advance directives in place.
  • Further dialogue is needed on balancing documented wishes with the dynamic nature of patient well-being and quality of life.