Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Framework for intake simulation of functional ingredients.

Janneke Kloosterman1, Martine I Bakker, Nynke de Jong

  • 1National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720, BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Janneke.Kloosterman@RIVM.nl

Public Health Nutrition
|July 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Injury prevalence and characteristics among tennis coaches in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2026
Same author

Replacing meat and dairy with plant-based alternatives in the Netherlands: trade-offs in environmental impacts and critical nutrient intake.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Exploring spillover effects beyond workplace dietary interventions using agent-based modelling.

Public health nutrition·2026
Same author

Understanding consumption of animal- and plant-based protein sources in the Netherlands: A stakeholder-driven causal loop diagram.

Appetite·2026
Same author

Response to letter to the editor on: "the use of canonical dose-response models for benchmark dose analysis of continuous toxicological data".

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025
Same author

Vitamin D status of adults in the North of the Netherlands: cross-sectional results from the Lifelines cohort study.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2025

A new framework simulates mandatory or voluntary food fortification intakes, enhancing study comparability and revealing uncertainties. This tool aids in understanding nutrient intake distributions from fortified foods and supplements.

Area of Science:

  • Nutritional Science and Public Health
  • Food Science and Technology

Background:

  • Assessing nutrient intake from food fortification is crucial for public health.
  • Existing simulation methods for fortification lack standardization, hindering comparability.
  • A unified framework is needed for both mandatory and voluntary fortification simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general framework for simulating nutrient intakes from mandatory and voluntary food fortification.
  • To improve the comparability of simulation study outcomes.
  • To provide insights into the uncertainties associated with fortification intake simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a six-step general framework based on existing mandatory fortification simulation methods.
  • Extended the framework to accommodate voluntary fortification scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustrated the framework's application using case studies of folic acid fortification.
  • Main Results:

    • The framework comprises six sequential steps: strategy definition, carrier product identification, fortification level setting, composition data creation, consumption data integration, and intake calculation.
    • The simulation process yields total habitual intake distributions for functional ingredients.
    • The framework was successfully applied to simulate folic acid fortification in the Netherlands.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed framework is applicable for simulating both mandatory and voluntary fortification.
    • Habitual intake distributions can be estimated even with incomplete or diverse data sources using statistical or modeling approaches.
    • Transparent documentation of the simulation procedure is essential for understanding uncertainties and identifying knowledge gaps.