Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024

Same author

What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prokofiev was (almost) right: A cross-cultural investigation of auditory-conceptual associations in Peter and the Wolf.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prevalence and predictors of binge eating disorder symptoms among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey.

Health science reports·2023

Same author

More of me: Self-prioritization of numeric stimuli.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023

Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.

Nicholas P Holmes¹, Gemma A Calvert, Charles Spence

¹Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. npholmes@neurobiography.info

Experimental Brain Research

|August 1, 2007

Summary

Preparing to use tools enhances multisensory integration, specifically visual-tactile interactions. This effect is linked to the behavioral relevance of stimuli during tool use preparation.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Primate Behavior

Background:

Tool use in primates is known to alter neural representations of multisensory peripersonal space.
Previous research indicates short tool use periods expand spatial representations for minutes post-action.
The rapid, trial-by-trial changes in multisensory interactions related to tool use remain under-investigated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how individual tool use movements, on a short time scale, affect multisensory integration.
To examine the role of tool use predictability in modulating these rapid multisensory changes.
To determine the spatial extent of altered multisensory interactions during tool use preparation.

Main Methods:

Measured crossmodal (visual-tactile) congruency effects as a proxy for multisensory integration.
Employed two tool use tasks: one with predictable sequences, another with unpredictable timing and location.
Assessed changes in multisensory integration relative to individual tool use actions.

Main Results:

Multisensory integration effects increased with proximity to tool use in a predictable task, but not in an unpredictable one.
These enhancements were observed near the hands and tool tips, irrespective of predictability.
The findings suggest endogenous preparation for tool use amplifies visual-tactile interactions.

Conclusions:

Preparing to use tools enhances visual-tactile interactions, particularly when tool use is predictable.
This enhancement is likely driven by increased behavioral relevance of visual stimuli preceding tool use.
The study highlights rapid, dynamic modulation of multisensory space by active tool use preparation.