Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cephalometry.

Peter J Taub1

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA. peter.taub@mountsinai.org

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|August 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

X-ray technology aids in diagnosing craniofacial anomalies. Key landmarks identified improve planning for orthognathic reconstruction of facial architecture.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Closed-suction Drains Reduce Postoperative Complications After Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty With Adjunct Liposuction.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Bridging the Gap: Assessing the Reporting of Social Determinants of Health Across a Decade of Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same author

A review of nipple-areola complex reconstruction and tattooing techniques.

Gland surgery·2026
Same author

Recent preoperative opioid prescription is associated with increased complications after microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Primary Language as a Predictor of Perioperative Opioid Consumption and Clinical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Craniofacial Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

A Comparative Study Between the Modified Septal Extension Graft Based on the L-Strut Septum and the Costal Cartilage Graft Based on an Intact Native Septum in Nasal Plasty.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Does Angular Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus Alter Fracture Patterns Compared With the Modifications of Posnick, Wolford, and Hunsuck/Epker?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Why Straight and Curved Platysma Morphologies May Produce Opposite Clinical Effects?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Does Preoperative Aprepitant Reduce Nausea and Emesis After Orthognathic Surgery?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

The Superficial Temporal Artery: Anatomical Variations in Course, Branching Patterns, Depth Relationships, and Anastomotic Networks-A Systematic Review of Cadaveric and Imaging Evidence.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Pouch-Type Flap Configuration for the Reconstruction of Extensive Retromolar Defects.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and craniofacial surgery
  • Radiographic analysis of skeletal structures

Background:

  • Advancements in X-ray technology have enabled detailed study of the craniofacial skeleton.
  • Accurate diagnosis and treatment planning are crucial for craniofacial anomalies.

Observation:

  • Numerous landmarks on the craniofacial skeleton have been identified and analyzed.
  • These landmarks are essential for understanding facial architecture and planning interventions.

Findings:

  • The study highlights critical craniofacial landmarks.
  • These landmarks provide a basis for diagnosing skeletal discrepancies and planning corrective surgeries.

Implications:

  • Improved diagnostic accuracy for craniofacial anomalies.
  • Enhanced planning and execution of orthognathic reconstruction procedures.
  • Better patient outcomes through precise surgical interventions.