Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Double response to Stroop stimuli.

H Shimada1, Y Nakajima

  • 1Kobe University of Mercantile Marine, Japan.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|October 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reexamined the Stroop effect, finding no support for Klein's 1964 findings or the competition explanation. Results indicate task order did not significantly impact response times in the double-response Stroop task.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Involvement of an AP-1 complex in zone-specific expression of the CYP11B1 gene in the rat adrenal cortex.

Molecular and cellular biology·1995
Same author

Identification of subsets of neuroblastomas by combined histopathologic and N-myc analysis.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1995
Same author

[Mutagenicity studies of iodixanol, a new non-ionic isotonic contrast medium].

The Journal of toxicological sciences·1995
Same author

Effect of aging on spontaneous micronucleus frequencies in peripheral blood of nine mouse strains: the results of the 7th collaborative study organized by CSGMT/JEMS.MMS. Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test. Environmental Mutagen Society of Japan. Mammalian Mutagenesis Study Group.

Mutation research·1995
Same author

Hederagenin glycosides from Pometia eximia.

Phytochemistry·1995
Same author

[Experience in intra-hepatic-arterial chemotherapy and hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer].

Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy·1995
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • The Stroop effect, a well-documented phenomenon in cognitive psychology, describes the interference in reaction time experienced when the name of a color is presented in a color different from the one it denotes.
  • Klein's (1964) findings proposed a specific explanation for this effect, suggesting a competition between stimulus processing pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically reexamine Klein's (1964) findings regarding the Stroop effect.
  • To investigate the impact of response order on performance in a double-response Stroop task.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using incongruent color-word stimuli.
  • Experiment 1 utilized a CRT display, while Experiment 2 used a color-word card.
  • Participants performed a double-response task, either reading words before naming colors or vice versa.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response times were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (task order x task type).

    • Main Results:

    • No significant main effects or interactions were found for task order or task type on response times.
    • A subset of participants exhibited error-like responses, reversing the typical task order.
    • The obtained results did not corroborate Klein's (1964) original findings.

    Conclusions:

    • The study's findings do not support Klein's (1964) explanation of the Stroop effect.
    • The competition explanation of the Stroop effect is not supported by the current experimental data.
    • Further research may be needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the Stroop effect.