Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds.

Robert A Lutfi1, Ching-Ju Liu

  • 1Department of Communicative Disorders and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. ralutfi@wisc.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrative Modeling of Individual Differences Recognizing Speech in Noise by Hearing-Impaired Adults.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.

Trends in hearing·2021
Same author

A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

Auditory preference of children with autism spectrum disorders.

Cognitive processing·2016
Same author

Modulation of the Tumor Metastatic Microenvironment and Multiple Signal Pathways by Prunella vulgaris in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The American journal of Chinese medicine·2016
Same journal

Segmental vs phrase-level creak in Polish: An acoustic analysis.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Listeners

Area of Science:

  • Acoustic perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Auditory scene analysis

Background:

  • Synthesized impact sounds mimic natural vibrations of objects.
  • Understanding how humans perceive sound source properties is crucial for auditory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate listener decision strategies in identifying sound source properties.
  • Determine factors influencing identification accuracy and strategy consistency.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesized impact sounds from vibrating membranes, bars, and plates.
  • Two-interval, forced-choice listening tasks.
  • Discriminant analysis of listener responses to acoustic parameters.

Main Results:

  • Significant individual differences in decision strategies were observed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Listeners showed consistent strategies within tasks but varied across tasks.
  • Similar decision strategies to ideal observers emerged only with highly constrained acoustic information (damping identification).
  • Identification accuracy was generally consistent across listeners, irrespective of strategy differences.
  • Variations in accuracy were linked to internal noise, not decision strategy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Individual differences in auditory perception strategies are substantial.
    • Listeners adapt strategies based on acoustic information constraints.
    • Internal noise, rather than decision strategy, is a primary determinant of identification accuracy differences.