Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Aboriginal community-led approach to reducing alcohol-related harm: A multiple baseline, stepped wedge evaluation.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

SMART Family and Friends Mutual-Help Groups: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Formative Implementation Evaluation.

Drug and alcohol review·2026
Same author

A systematic scoping review of indigenous-specific research evidence on child sexual abuse.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

<i>'We are experts in telling our story'</i>: the perspectives of stakeholders from Aboriginal Community-Controlled Health Services on the health and wellbeing of urban First Nations Australians, and their priorities for a First Nations urban health research agenda in Australia.

Primary health care research & development·2026
Same author

Expanding Access to Addiction Medicine Specialist Care in Regional New South Wales, Australia Through Telehealth.

Drug and alcohol review·2026
Same author

Prevention of Adverse Cardiovascular Events Using the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA cardiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research.

Nathan G Hawkins1, Robert W Sanson-Fisher, Anthony Shakeshaft

  • 1Health Behavior Unit, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|August 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The multiple baseline design offers a practical alternative to randomized controlled trials for evaluating population-based health interventions. This research design allows communities to serve as their own controls, enhancing feasibility and reducing costs.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Research Methods
  • Intervention Effectiveness Evaluation
  • Community Health Studies

Background:

  • Population-based health interventions require rigorous evaluation designs.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) present practical, ethical, and cost limitations for such evaluations.
  • Alternative research designs are needed to assess intervention effectiveness in real-world settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the multiple baseline design for population-based health interventions.
  • To compare the advantages and limitations of the multiple baseline design against RCTs.
  • To provide recommendations for utilizing and improving the multiple baseline design.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses the methodological aspects of the multiple baseline design.
  • It highlights its ability to demonstrate behavioral change, causality, and significance.
  • Comparison with randomized controlled trials is a key focus.

Main Results:

  • The multiple baseline design demonstrates behavioral change resulting from interventions.
  • It offers practical advantages over RCTs, including fewer required population groups.
  • Communities can serve as their own controls, increasing practicality.

Conclusions:

  • The multiple baseline design is a viable and pragmatic alternative for evaluating population-based health interventions.
  • Its strengths lie in its practicality, reduced participant numbers, and self-controlled nature.
  • Strategies to mitigate methodological limitations should be explored for future research.