Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Malpractice reports in prosthodontics in Sweden.

N René1, B Owall

  • 1Department of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, University of Lund, Sweden.

Swedish Dental Journal
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Prosthodontics is frequently implicated in Swedish dental malpractice cases, with fixed prosthodontics being a common issue. Most patient complaints involve elementary faults in bridges, dentures, and crowns, leading to significant sanctions for practitioners.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Denture marking: a questionnaire for patients and dentists.

The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology·2023
Same author

Patients' experience of partial tooth loss and expectations to treatment: a qualitative study in Danish and Swedish patients.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2015
Same author

Postoperative radiation therapy after hip replacement in high-risk patients for development of heterotopic bone formation.

Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique·2011
Same author

Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2010
Same author

Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2009
Same author

Implants and/or teeth: consensus statements and recommendations.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2008

Area of Science:

  • Dental Science
  • Public Health Policy
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Prosthodontics is a significant area for dental malpractice claims in Sweden.
  • Increased dental insurance and practitioner numbers correlate with rising malpractice cases.
  • Prosthodontic treatments consume substantial practitioner time and generate a disproportionate number of sanctions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the trends and commonalities in dental malpractice cases involving prosthodontics in Sweden.
  • To identify specific prosthodontic treatments and anatomical regions most frequently cited in complaints.
  • To investigate potential correlations between dentist age, fault quality, and sanction severity.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of dental malpractice case data in Sweden from 1947-1988.
  • Categorization of complaints by prosthodontic treatment type, anatomical region, and fault characteristics.
  • Statistical comparison of fault frequency and sanction severity across different dentist age groups.

Main Results:

  • Fixed prosthodontics, including bridges (2-4 units), complete dentures, and single crowns, are most frequently involved in malpractice complaints.
  • The maxillary anterior and premolar regions are the most common sites for prosthodontic complaints.
  • While fault quantity shows no age-related difference, older dentists appear to receive more severe sanctions, suggesting potential quality variations.

Conclusions:

  • Elementary faults in common prosthodontic restorations are persistent issues contributing to malpractice claims.
  • The findings highlight the need for continued quality assessment and education in prosthodontics to reduce patient complaints and legal actions.
  • Dentist experience may influence sanction severity, warranting further investigation into quality of care differences.

Related Experiment Videos