Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Melina A Kunar1, Stephen Flusberg, Todd S Horowitz

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom. m.a.kunar@warwick.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|August 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making time for a dynamic attentional priority map.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

The Shape of Saccade-based Functional Visual Fields (FVFs): A cautionary note.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

A common signal-strength factor limits awareness and precise knowledge of multiple moving objects across the adult lifespan.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Intrinsic motivation and false feedback reduce the low prevalence effect.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025
Same author

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025

Contextual cuing, where repeated displays speed up target detection, may not solely rely on attentional guidance. Response selection processes also significantly contribute to this effect.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Visual attention
  • Human perception

Background:

  • Contextual cuing improves visual search performance with repeated displays, even without awareness.
  • Attentional guidance by display context has been the dominant explanation for contextual cuing.
  • Previous research suggests display context guides attention to targets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of contextual cuing.
  • To compare the role of attentional guidance in standard search versus contextual cuing.
  • To determine if response selection processes contribute to contextual cuing effects.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1 compared search slopes in standard search and contextual cuing tasks.
  • Experiments 2a and 2b examined contextual cuing under optimal guidance conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 3 introduced response selection interference to assess its impact on contextual cuing.

    • Main Results:

    • Search slopes did not improve over time in contextual cuing, unlike in standard search.
    • A reliable contextual cuing effect persisted even with optimal guidance.
    • The contextual cuing effect diminished when response selection was interfered with.

    Conclusions:

    • The relationship between attentional guidance and contextual cuing is weaker than previously assumed.
    • Response selection processes play a significant role in contextual cuing.
    • Contextual cuing likely involves multiple mechanisms beyond pure attentional guidance.