Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

14:05
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen
Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)
|August 9, 2007
Summary
School entry hearing screening (SES) in the UK shows variable implementation and quality, with a lack of national guidance and poor protocols. Further research is needed to improve quality and audit performance for better identification of hearing impairments.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Public Health
- Pediatrics
Background:
- School entry hearing screening (SES) is a common practice in the UK for identifying childhood hearing loss.
- Current practices exhibit significant variability in implementation, protocols, and quality assurance.
- The effectiveness and efficiency of SES require detailed analysis to inform policy and practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively describe and analyze the current state of school entry hearing screening in the UK.
- To evaluate the implementation, protocols, target population, and performance data of SES programs.
- To review alternative screening tests, their performance, and economic implications.
Main Methods:
- National postal questionnaire survey of SES leads across the UK.
- Analysis of primary cohort data from London.
- Systematic review of alternative SES tests and economic evaluations.
Main Results:
- SES is widely used but implementation is inconsistent, with poor protocols and variable coverage.
- Newborn hearing screening significantly reduces the yield of SES for permanent hearing impairments.
- The pure tone sweep test demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity, but evidence on alternative tests and long-term outcomes is limited.
- Economic evaluations suggest targeted screening may be more cost-effective, but with considerable uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- A significant lack of high-quality evidence hinders evidence-based policy decisions for SES.
- Improving the quality and auditing of SES performance is crucial for identifying previously unknown permanent hearing impairments.
- Further research is needed to develop and evaluate agreed national protocols for comparable future studies and audits.

