Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal aspects of cue combination.

Christa M van Mierlo1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets

  • 1Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. C.vanMierlo@fbw.vu.nl

Journal of Vision
|August 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orchestrating gameplay in Dutch physical education: how and why teachers regulate task difficulty.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Enforcing a high success percentage interferes with reward-based motor learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

The brain combines visual cues like monocular and binocular vision effectively, even with timing delays. This suggests that minor differences in neural processing speed do not hinder cue integration for perception.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception
  • Visual processing

Background:

  • The human brain integrates sensory information arriving at different times.
  • Neural pathways process various visual cues, such as monocular and binocular information, with distinct latencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the brain combines visual cues with differing neural latencies.
  • To determine the impact of artificial asynchrony on cue integration for surface slant perception.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced artificial timing differences (asynchrony) between monocular and binocular visual cues signaling surface slant changes.
  • Participants performed tasks requiring detection or direction indication of slant changes.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Visual cues were successfully combined to enhance performance despite artificial asynchronies up to approximately 100 milliseconds.
  • Performance improved even when cues were presented with significant temporal discrepancies.

Conclusions:

  • Neural latency differences in the tens of milliseconds are inconsequential for cue integration.
  • The brain's low temporal resolution in neural processing makes it robust to minor timing variations in sensory input.