Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Measurement of the Directional Information Flow in fNIRS-Hyperscanning Data using the Partial Wavelet Transform Coherence Method
Published on: September 3, 2021
What does the Wonderlic Personnel Test measure?
T Darin Matthews1, Kerry S Lassiter
1The Citadel, Department of Psychology, 171 Moultrie Street, Charleston, SC 29409, USA. 3matthewsd@citadel.edu
The Wonderlic Personnel Test shows moderate validity for overall cognitive ability, correlating most strongly with the Woodcock-Johnson-Revised Tests of Cognitive Ability. However, it does not clearly distinguish between fluid and crystallized reasoning skills.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Cognitive Psychology
- Educational Assessment
Background:
- The Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT) is a widely used cognitive ability test.
- Understanding its validity against comprehensive cognitive assessments is crucial for accurate personnel selection.
- The Woodcock-Johnson-Revised Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJ-R) provide a broad measure of cognitive functioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the concurrent validity of the Wonderlic Personnel Test.
- To compare Wonderlic scores with specific cognitive abilities measured by the Woodcock-Johnson-Revised Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJ-R).
- To assess the convergent and divergent validity of the Wonderlic across fluid and crystallized reasoning.
Main Methods:
- 37 college students (18-54 years) completed both the Wonderlic Personnel Test and the WJ-R.
- Concurrent validity was assessed using correlation coefficients between test scores.
- Analysis focused on the relationship between the Wonderlic Total score and WJ-R Broad Cognitive Ability, Comprehensive Knowledge, and fluid reasoning scores.
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation (r = .55) was found between the Wonderlic Total score and the WJ-R Broad Cognitive Ability Standard Battery.
- The Wonderlic score also correlated significantly with WJ-R Comprehensive Knowledge (r = .34).
- No significant correlation was observed between the Wonderlic and fluid reasoning (r = .26), though it was most strongly associated with overall IQ.
Conclusions:
- The Wonderlic Personnel Test demonstrates moderate concurrent validity with overall cognitive functioning as measured by the WJ-R.
- Wonderlic scores appear more aligned with crystallized abilities than fluid reasoning.
- The study did not find clear evidence for convergent and divergent validity of the Wonderlic across fluid and crystallized cognitive domains.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
06:02Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
Published on: October 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Intelligence