Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Internal carotid artery revascularization].

Jean-Louis Mas1

  • 1Departamento de Neurología y Unidad de Accidentes Cerebrovasculares, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France. jl.mas@ch-sainte-anne.fr

Revista Espanola De Cardiologia
|August 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke and the PASCAL Classification System.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same author

Divided attention and manual visuomotor control in stroke: a combined dual-task and eye movement study.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Treatment of patent foramen ovale.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2025
Same author

Sex Differences in Frequency, Severity, and Distribution of Cerebral Microbleeds.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Older Patients With Stroke: Patient Selection for Trial Feasibility.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Post-Stroke Impairments of Manual Dexterity and Finger Proprioception: Their Contribution to Upper Limb Activity Capacity.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2024
Same journal

[Early remote monitoring of pacemaker devices and benefits of this paradigm shift. The FAST REMOTE study].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with post SARS-CoV-2 sequelae: need to create a multicenter working group. Response].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Myocarditis related SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination: an expert consensus statement on its diagnosis and management].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with post SARS-CoV-2 sequelae: need to create a multicenter working group].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Environment and cardiovascular health: causes, consequences and opportunities in prevention and treatment].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2022
Same journal

[Third-degree atrioventricular block associated with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2022
See all related articles

Carotid endarterectomy is a standard stroke prevention surgery for severe carotid stenosis. The benefit varies by stenosis severity and patient symptoms, requiring individualized risk-benefit assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Cardiovascular Medicine

Context:

  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the established surgical intervention for preventing ischemic stroke caused by carotid artery stenosis.
  • Severe stenosis (≥70%) in symptomatic patients significantly benefits from CEA, reducing stroke risk.
  • The efficacy of CEA diminishes with less severe stenosis (50-69%) and is not beneficial for stenosis <50%.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in preventing ischemic stroke across different patient populations and stenosis severities.
  • To compare CEA with carotid stenting (CAS) and medical management.
  • To inform clinical decision-making regarding carotid revascularization.

Summary:

  • CEA is highly effective for symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥70%.

Related Experiment Videos

  • For asymptomatic stenosis (60-99%), CEA offers a modest annual stroke risk reduction (1%).
  • Evidence is limited for asymptomatic women and patients >75 years.
  • Carotid stenting is not superior to CEA in surgical candidates.
  • The benefit of revascularization over medical treatment alone is uncertain.

    • Impact:

    • Highlights the importance of patient-specific factors in determining the optimal treatment strategy for carotid stenosis.
    • Suggests that CEA remains the gold standard for specific patient groups.
    • Identifies knowledge gaps regarding the long-term benefits in certain demographics and the superiority of revascularization over medical therapy.