Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Prognostic value of mouth occlusion pressure in patients with chronic ventilatory failure
Stephan Budweiser1, Rudolf A Jörres, Carl-Peter Criée
1Center for Pneumology, Donaustauf Hospital, Ludwigstrasse 68, D-93093, Donaustauf, Germany. stephan.budweiser@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Background:
Mouth occlusion pressure measurement is widely used for assessment of respiratory muscle function, particularly in patients with respiratory failure. However, its predictive value for long-term survival remains largely unexplored.
Methods:
In 464 patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) due to various underlying disorders and receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV), maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PI(max)), mouth occlusion pressure at 100 ms during quiet breathing (P(0.1)) and the ratio P(0.1)/PI(max) were assessed prior to and after treatment including NIV. Baseline data and changes at follow-up were used to evaluate their predictive value for long-term survival.
Results:
Overall, median (quartiles) P(0.1) was 177.0 (109.2;287.0) %pred, PI(max) 35.0 (24.0;47.0) %pred, and P(0.1)/PI(max) 564.0 (275.7;1082.3) %pred. In multivariate analyses, P(0.1) was related to airflow obstruction, lung hyperinflation, haemoglobin (Hb) and leukocytes, and PI(max) to airflow obstruction and hyperinflation (p<0.05 each). All-cause mortality during follow-up (median 31.6 months) was 31.5%. Survival was associated with age, body-mass index (BMI), lung function, leukocytes, Hb, PI(max), P(0.1) and P(0.1)/PI(max) (p<0.01 each, univariate). Among these multivariate Cox regression identified age, BMI, FEV(1), leukocytes and P(0.1)/PI(max) as independent predictors (p<0.05 each). Furthermore, the decrease of P(0.1)/PI(max) at follow-up was associated with improved survival in patients with high baseline P(0.1)/PI(max) (>50th or 75th percentile; p<0.05).
Conclusions:
In patients with CHRF and current NIV therapy, P(0.1)/PI(max) was an independent predictor of long-term survival, in addition to previously established risk factors. Moreover, a decrease in P(0.1)/PI(max) after treatment including NIV was associated with an improved survival in patients with high baseline P(0.1)/PI(max) values.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation: