Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing the Learning Door: a case study in youth participatory program planning.

Justus J Randolph1, Pasi J Eronen

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, FIN-80101, Joensuu, Finland. justus.randolph@cs.joensuu.fi

Evaluation and Program Planning
|August 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

US nurse practitioner voluntary turnover: Development of a framework for analysis.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2023
Same author

Montessori education's impact on academic and nonacademic outcomes: A systematic review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2023
Same author

Content analysis of dissertations for examination of priority areas of nursing science.

Nursing outlook·2021
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
See all related articles

Youth participatory program planning successfully engaged diverse stakeholders to develop assistive technology. Key lessons emphasize clarifying collaboration, regular review, and distinct planning models for effective project outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Community Engagement
  • Educational Technology
  • Assistive Technology Design

Background:

  • Nonformal technology-education programs offer unique settings for collaborative design.
  • Engaging youth, university, and business stakeholders is crucial for developing relevant solutions.
  • Addressing the needs of older adults and people with disabilities requires inclusive planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the results of a case study on youth participatory program planning.
  • To evaluate a collaborative process for creating assistive technology.
  • To identify lessons learned in stakeholder engagement for program development.

Main Methods:

  • Case study methodology in eastern Finland.
  • Participatory program planning involving youth, university, and business stakeholders.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a "Learning Door" assistive technology prototype.

    • Main Results:

    • The observed program planning process closely aligned with the intended plan.
    • Stakeholders reported positive reception of the participatory planning approach.
    • The collaborative effort successfully produced a functional program plan.

    Conclusions:

    • Clarifying the nature of collaboration early is vital for participatory programs.
    • Regular review of program planning steps enhances project coherence.
    • Distinguishing between logic models and implementation plans improves clarity and execution.