Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Is it possible to predict which patients need distal protection during primary angioplasty?
Hisashi Umeda1, Mitsunori Iwase, Hideo Izawa
1Division of Cardiology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Heiwa-cho, Toyota 471-8513, Japan. humedamd@ybb.ne.jp
Insights
Distal protection devices (DP) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improve outcomes for specific ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. These devices reduce complications and infarct size in those with right coronary artery lesions, large thrombi, or large infarct-related arteries.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Management
Background:
- The clinical utility of distal protection (DP) devices during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is debated.
- Identifying patient subgroups who benefit from DP is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
- This study investigates clinical and angiographic predictors of DP benefit in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine which clinical and angiographic characteristics identify STEMI patients who benefit from distal protection (DP) during primary PCI.
- To evaluate the impact of DP on reperfusion rates, thromboembolic complications, and infarct size in specific STEMI patient subgroups.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 103 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and DP.
- Comparison group comprised 98 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI alone.
- Outcomes assessed included rates of thromboembolic complications, optimal reperfusion (myocardial blush grade ≥2 and ST-segment resolution ≥70%), and infarct size.
Main Results:
- Overall, DP use did not significantly differ in reducing thromboembolic complications or improving reperfusion and infarct size compared to PCI alone.
- However, DP was associated with significantly higher rates of optimal reperfusion in patients with right coronary artery (RCA) lesions (OR 2.45), thrombus score ≥4 (OR 2.64), or large infarct-related artery (IRA) diameter ≥3.5 mm (OR 4.09).
- In these specific subgroups (RCA lesions, high thrombus score, or large IRA), DP use significantly reduced thromboembolic complications and infarct size.
Conclusions:
- Distal protection (DP) devices may be beneficial in primary PCI for STEMI patients with specific characteristics.
- Patients with right coronary artery (RCA) culprit lesions, a large thrombus burden, or a large infarct-related artery (IRA) diameter demonstrated improved outcomes with DP.
- These findings suggest that DP can reduce thromboembolic complications, enhance reperfusion, and minimize infarct size in selected STEMI populations.
Background:
Although the benefit of distal protection (DP) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains questionable, there appears to be efficacy in some clinical situations. We sought to identify in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) which clinical and angiographic characteristics might indicate the patient who will benefit from the use of a DP device.
Methods:
A series of 103 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI using DP were compared with 98 consecutive patients treated by primary PCI alone.
Results:
The overall rates of thromboembolic complications and achievement of optimal reperfusion (myocardial blush grade >/=2 and ST-segment resolution >/=70%), and infarct size, were similar between the 2 groups. However, DP use was associated with higher rates of optimal reperfusion in patients with right coronary artery (RCA) lesions (OR 2.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 5.59; P=0.034), thrombus score >/=4 (OR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.07 to 6.50; P=0.034) or infarct-related artery (IRA) of >/=3.5 mm in diameter (OR 4.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 16.40; P=0.047). In this population (RCA location, thrombus score >/=4, or IRA >/=3.5 mm), DP use reduced the risk of thromboembolic complications (64%, P=0.012, 45%, P=0.035 and 54%, P=0.050, respectively), resulting in a smaller infarct size (8.0+/-5.1 vs. 11.7+/-7.5, P=0.028, 13.1+/-8.8 vs. 17.4+/-10.0, P=0.026 and 15.5+/-10.8 vs. 22.1+/-10.1, P=0.042, respectively).
Conclusions:
The use of a DP during primary PCI may lead to a reduction of thromboembolic complications, subsequent higher rates of optimal reperfusion and reduced infarct size in patients with RCA culprit lesions, a large thrombus, or large IRA.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management