Related Experiment Videos
Concurrent infections in acute febrile illness patients in Egypt
Tina M Parker1, Clinton K Murray, Allen L Richards
1United States Naval Medical Unit No. 3, FPO AE 09835, Cairo, Egypt 09835. tina_parker@uiowa.edu
Abstract:
We report the occurrence of concurrent infections with multiple acute febrile illness (AFI) pathogens during an ongoing prospective laboratory-based surveillance in four infectious disease hospitals in urban and rural areas of Egypt from June 2005 to August 2006. Patients were screened for Leptospira, Rickettsia typhi, Brucella, or Salmonella enterica serogroup Typhi by various methods including serology, culture, and PCR. One hundred eighty-seven of 1,510 patients (12.4%) evaluated had supporting evidence for the presence of co-infections; 20 (1%) of these patients had 2 or more pathogens based upon confirmatory 4-fold rise in antibody titer, culture, and/or PCR. Most coinfected patients lived or worked in rural agricultural areas. The high coinfection rates suggest that defining the etiologies of AFI is imperative in guiding proper disease treatment, prevention, and control strategies in Egypt.
Insights
Concurrent infections with multiple acute febrile illness (AFI) pathogens were found in 12.4% of patients in Egypt. High coinfection rates highlight the need for accurate diagnosis of AFI to guide effective treatment and prevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
- Microbiology
Background:
- Acute febrile illness (AFI) poses a significant public health challenge in Egypt.
- Concurrent infections with multiple pathogens can complicate diagnosis and treatment of AFI.
- Limited data exists on the prevalence of co-infections among AFI patients in Egypt.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the occurrence of concurrent infections with multiple AFI pathogens in Egypt.
- To identify the prevalence of specific co-infecting pathogens including Leptospira, Rickettsia typhi, Brucella, and Salmonella enterica serogroup Typhi.
- To assess the impact of geographical location (urban vs. rural) on coinfection rates.
Main Methods:
- Prospective laboratory-based surveillance conducted in four infectious disease hospitals in Egypt from June 2005 to August 2006.
- Patients were screened for four key AFI pathogens using serology, culture, and PCR.
- Confirmatory evidence for co-infections included a 4-fold rise in antibody titer, positive culture, and/or positive PCR results.
Main Results:
- Out of 1,510 evaluated patients, 187 (12.4%) showed evidence of co-infections.
- A total of 20 patients (1%) were confirmed to have infections with two or more pathogens.
- Co-infected patients were predominantly from rural agricultural areas, suggesting a link between occupation/environment and coinfection risk.
Conclusions:
- Concurrent infections with multiple AFI pathogens are common in Egypt, particularly in rural settings.
- Accurate etiological diagnosis of AFI is crucial for effective patient management, including appropriate treatment and prevention strategies.
- Further research into the epidemiology and clinical impact of AFI co-infections in Egypt is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Patterns of Fever
Amebiasis
Increased Body Temperature