Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Deception detection expertise
1Department of Social Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA. gary.bond@gmail.com
Abstract:
A lively debate between Bond and Uysal (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109-115) and O'Sullivan (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117-123) concerns whether there are experts in deception detection. Two experiments sought to (a) identify expert(s) in detection and assess them twice with four tests, and (b) study their detection behavior using eye tracking. Paroled felons produced videotaped statements that were presented to students and law enforcement personnel. Two experts were identified, both female Native American BIA correctional officers. Experts were over 80% accurate in the first assessment, and scored at 90% accuracy in the second assessment. In Signal Detection analyses, experts showed high discrimination, and did not evidence biased responding. They exploited nonverbal cues to make fast, accurate decisions. These highly-accurate individuals can be characterized as experts in deception detection.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Dark Triad and Person Perception
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Ethics in Research
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

