Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Deception detection expertise.

Gary D Bond1

  • 1Department of Social Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA. gary.bond@gmail.com

Law and Human Behavior
|August 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Cultural Practices Influence the Understanding and Emotional Intensity of Mexican Children's Memories of Death Events.

Psychological reports·2024
Same author

'Sleepy Joe' and 'Donald, King of Whoppers': Reality Monitoring and Verbal Deception in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election Debates.

Psychological reports·2022
Same author

Remembering the Super-Typhoon: Some, but Not All, Qualities of First-Hand Survivor Memories of Natural Disaster Are Similar to Near Death Experience and Flashbulb Memory Accounts.

Psychological reports·2020
Same author

This Too Shall Pass: Evidence of Coping and Fading Emotion in African Americans' Memories of Violent and Nonviolent Death.

Omega·2015
Same author

Lifespan differences in the social networks of prison inmates.

International journal of aging & human development·2005
Same author

Vulnerability of older adults to deception in prison and nonprison contexts.

Psychology and aging·2005
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study identified experts in deception detection, who demonstrated over 80% accuracy using nonverbal cues. These findings confirm the existence of deception detection experts.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Debate exists on the existence of deception detection experts.
  • Previous research has not conclusively identified or assessed such experts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and assess individuals with expertise in deception detection.
  • To analyze the behavioral strategies employed by these experts using eye-tracking technology.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using videotaped statements from paroled felons.
  • Participants included students and law enforcement personnel, with two experts identified.
  • Eye-tracking technology was utilized to study expert decision-making processes.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two experts, both female Native American BIA correctional officers, were identified.
  • Experts achieved over 80% accuracy in the first assessment and 90% in the second.
  • Signal Detection analyses revealed high discrimination and unbiased responding in experts, who utilized nonverbal cues for rapid, accurate decisions.

Conclusions:

  • The study successfully identified individuals who can be characterized as experts in deception detection.
  • Experts demonstrated superior accuracy and effective use of nonverbal cues in identifying deception.