Driven from distraction: how infants respond to parents' attempts to elicit and re-direct their attention

Gedeon O Deák1, Tedra A Walden, Marygrace Yale Kaiser

  • 1Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, 9500 Gilman Dr., San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0515, USA. deak@cogsci.ucsd.edu

Insights

Parents

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Infant Behavior

Background:

  • Understanding how infants learn to share attention is crucial for cognitive and social development.
  • Parental cues play a significant role in guiding infant attention, but the specific mechanisms are complex.
  • Research is needed to differentiate the impact of various parental cues on infant attention-sharing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how parents' verbal and non-verbal cues influence infant attention-sharing in a multi-object environment.
  • To determine the effectiveness of different parental cues (gaze, pointing, verbalizations) in directing infant attention.
  • To examine age-related differences in infant responses to parental attention cues.

Main Methods:

  • Fifteen- and 21-month-old infants participated in a toy-play experiment with their parents.
  • Parents used gaze shifts, pointing gestures, and verbalizations (eliciting or directing) to direct infant attention.
  • Gaze occlusion trials were included to assess the role of visual contact.

Main Results:

  • Infants rarely followed simple gaze shifts but frequently followed gaze combined with pointing or directing verbalizations.
  • Attention-eliciting verbalizations increased infant engagement with the parent.
  • Gaze occlusion diminished infant responses to directing verbalizations, and older infants showed increased responses to eliciting verbalizations.

Conclusions:

  • Combined parental cues (gaze + point/verbalization) are more effective than gaze alone for directing infant attention.
  • The development of attention-sharing is influenced by age and the type of parental cue.
  • Infant receptive vocabulary did not predict attention-sharing, suggesting that early attention mechanisms are distinct from language acquisition.