Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

07:26
Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
[Dissertations 25 years after date 16. The mutilated dentition].
1pasqualex@libero.it
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde
|August 19, 2007
Summary
Mutilated dentition treatment lacks scientific basis. Losing teeth with age doesn't impact oral function, suggesting prosthetic replacement is often unnecessary for healthy dentitions.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Health
- Prosthodontics
Context:
- Mutilated dentition treatment lacks robust scientific evidence.
- Previous research has not established a clear correlation between molar tooth loss and oral function.
- Age and socioeconomic status do not significantly alter tooth loss patterns.
Purpose:
- To investigate the scientific basis for treating mutilated dentitions.
- To determine the correlation between tooth loss and oral function.
- To evaluate the necessity of prosthetic tooth replacement.
Summary:
- Tooth loss increases with age across all socioeconomic classes.
- No significant correlation exists between the number of lost teeth and oral function.
- A weak correlation was found between occluding teeth pairs and subjective chewing ability.
- Prosthetic replacement of posterior teeth is often unnecessary with at least 3 occluding pairs.
- A dentition with at least 20 teeth, including anterior teeth and premolars, is functionally and aesthetically satisfactory.
Impact:
- Challenges the routine prosthetic replacement of posterior teeth in cases with adequate remaining dentition.
- Suggests that a minimum of 20 teeth, including anterior teeth and premolars, ensures satisfactory oral function and aesthetics.
- Provides evidence-based guidelines for treatment decisions in patients with mutilated dentitions.
