Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Four types of effect modification: a classification based on directed acyclic graphs.

Tyler J VanderWeele1, James M Robins

  • 1Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. vanderweele@uchicago.edu

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are.

Observational studies·2025
Same author

Rejoinder: Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are.

Observational studies·2025
Same author

Minimax rates for heterogeneous causal effect estimation.

Annals of statistics·2025
Same author

Erratum: Comparison of the Test-negative Design and Cohort Design With Explicit Target Trial Emulation for Evaluating COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Grace periods in comparative effectiveness studies of sustained treatments.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)·2024
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

This study classifies effect modification on the risk difference scale using causal diagrams. It identifies four types: direct, indirect, proxy, and common cause effect modification.

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Effect modification is crucial in understanding how causal relationships vary across subgroups.
  • Quantifying effect modification on the risk difference scale requires careful consideration of causal structures.
  • Existing frameworks may not fully delineate the types of causal relationships leading to effect modification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To classify the types of causal relationships that result in effect modification on the risk difference scale.
  • To utilize directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to elucidate the necessary causal structures for effect modification.
  • To propose a 4-fold classification of effect modification based on DAGs.

Main Methods:

  • Expressing conditional causal risk differences as sums of products of stratum-specific risk differences and conditional probabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to visualize and analyze causal relationships.
  • Developing a classification system based on the identified causal structures.

    • Main Results:

    • A 4-fold classification of effect modification is proposed: direct, indirect, effect modification by proxy, and effect modification by a common cause.
    • DAGs effectively clarify the specific causal pathways required for each type of effect modification.
    • The framework accommodates multiple effect modification relationships and modifiers.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed classification provides a structured approach to understanding effect modification on the risk difference scale.
    • Directed acyclic graphs are powerful tools for dissecting complex causal relationships in effect modification.
    • This framework enhances the analysis of heterogeneity in treatment effects and risk factors.