Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An interval-scaled scoring algorithm for visual function questionnaires.

Robert W Massof1

  • 1Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. rmassof@lions.med.jhu.edu

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hearing Impairment and Visual Rehabilitation Outcomes.

JAMA ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness between two types of head-mounted magnification modes using a smartphone-based virtual display.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2024
Same author

Application of Rasch Analysis to Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Low Vision: A Validation Study.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2023
Same author

MACUSTAR-Do We Have Accurate and Precise Visual Function Outcome Measures Needed to Conduct a Multicenter Clinical Trial of an Early Treatment for Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration?

JAMA ophthalmology·2022
Same author

The NEI VFQ-25C: Calibrating Items in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 to Enable Comparison of Outcome Measures.

Translational vision science & technology·2022
Same author

Patient-Reported Measures of the Effects of Vision Impairments and Low Vision Rehabilitation on Functioning in Daily Life.

Annual review of vision science·2022
Same journal

Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine- and hydrogen peroxide-based soft contact lens care solutions.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Agreement between ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer metrics from widefield optical coherence tomography and Goldmann II, III, and V in glaucoma.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Repeatability of SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in macular disease.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Reflections on emerging therapies for inherited retinal diseases following a community education event: A qualitative exploration.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Optical myopia control interventions: Evaluation of methods and success in a real-world population.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Influence of corneal endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty on contact lens induced corneal swelling.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
See all related articles

A new algorithm accurately scores visual function questionnaires (VFQs) for low vision patients, providing reliable visual ability estimates. This method proves that multiple VFQs measure the same visual ability and can be standardized to a common scale.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Psychometrics
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Visual function questionnaires (VFQs) are crucial for assessing patient-reported outcomes in low vision.
  • Existing scoring methods may lack precision or be sensitive to missing data.
  • Rasch analysis provides a robust framework for measuring health outcomes but can be complex to implement for routine scoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate a simple algorithm for scoring VFQs, approximating Rasch analysis estimates.
  • To ensure the algorithm is insensitive to nonlinearities at extreme scores and missing data.
  • To test if various VFQs measure a common visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a unified scale.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a scoring algorithm using average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administered four VFQs (ADVS, NEI VFQ, VF-14, VAQ) to 407 low vision patients.
  • Performed Rasch analyses on individual and merged VFQ data, comparing algorithm estimates to Rasch estimates.

    • Main Results:

    • The algorithm produced highly reliable (ICCs 0.97-0.997) and linear approximations of visual ability.
    • Measurement scales of individual VFQs were linear transformations of the merged scale.
    • The algorithm demonstrated robustness and insensitivity to missing data when tested with random censoring.

    Conclusions:

    • A simple algorithm effectively approximates Rasch-derived visual ability estimates for multiple VFQs.
    • All tested VFQs measure the same underlying visual ability.
    • The algorithm allows calibration of different VFQs to a common measurement scale, facilitating cross-instrument comparisons.