Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial compatibility effects with tool use.

Wilfried Kunde1, Jochen Müsselar, Herbert Heuer

  • 1Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. kunde@fb14.uni-dortmund.de

Human Factors
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Response Requirements Shape the Spatial Coding of Location-Specific Adjustments to Conflict Frequency.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Correction: The representational nature of action-effect relations: A memory process dissociation approach.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Tool use compatibility depends on stimulus-goal and goal-movement transformations, not just hand movement direction. Understanding these effects can improve tool-assisted tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Spatial compatibility between stimuli and responses significantly impacts performance.
  • Tools like first-class levers invert hand movements, creating unique spatial transformations.
  • Investigating compatibility effects in tool use is crucial for understanding human performance limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore constraints in responding to spatially variable stimuli during tool-assisted movements.
  • To identify distinct compatibility effects arising from tool use, specifically with first-class levers.
  • To differentiate between stimulus-goal and goal-movement compatibility in tool-mediated tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed directional responses (left/right) to visual stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hand movements controlled a pointer either directly or inversely through a tool interface.
  • Experimental conditions manipulated the correspondence between stimulus location, hand movement, and tool movement.

    • Main Results:

    • Response times were faster when stimulus location corresponded with tool movement direction, irrespective of hand movement.
    • This stimulus-tool correspondence effect persisted even when stimulus location was task-irrelevant.
    • Response times were slower when hand and tool movements were in non-corresponding directions.

    Conclusions:

    • Two distinct compatibility effects were identified: stimulus-to-goal and goal-to-movement transformations.
    • These findings highlight the importance of the tool's movement transformation in spatial compatibility.
    • Applications include predicting and mitigating 'fulcrum effects' in surgery and other lever-based tasks.