Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature

The ideal treatment for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction should have the highest success rate, enable treatment of all types of obstruction, allow removal coexisting renal stones, and be minimally invasive. Open pyeloplasty offers all these features except the last (minimal invasiveness), whereas endourology techniques guarantee only the last one. Different techniques of pyeloplasty can be applied laparoscopically, although the best results are seen with dismembered pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes technique). Various methods of tissue approximation have been devised to avoid the difficult-to-master, time-consuming conventional suturing technique. Laparoscopic (antegrade) stenting is preferred by some surgeons, but we consider retrograde stenting is superior, as this rules out the presence of associated distal-ureteral obstruction. The transperitoneal approach has the advantages of a larger working space and readily identifiable anatomic landmarks. However, access to the renal pelvis requires considerable mobilization and retraction of the overlying loops of bowel. The retroperitoneal approach has the perceived disadvantage of a somewhat limited working space and absence of readily identifiable intra-abdominal anatomic structures such as the liver and spleen. However, the retroperitoneal approach has the advantage of greater familiarity, better detection of crossing vessels, direct and rapid access to the UPJ, and less risk of ileus. The robot-assisted technique has made suturing easier and may allow expansion of advanced laparoscopic procedures to surgeons without expertise in advanced laparoscopic surgery. The optimal length of follow-up after pyeloplasty is still unclear. Although most failures occur within the first 2 years, failures continue to appear after 5 and 10 years.