Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

06:19
In situ Protocol for Butterfly Pupal Wings Using Riboprobes
Published on: May 28, 2007
Butterfly eyespot patterns and how evolutionary tinkering yields diversity.
1Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9516, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Summary
Butterfly eyespot evolution shows size is highly flexible, but color composition is constrained. This difference in evolvability impacts diversity patterns, revealing insights into genetic and developmental tinkering.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Developmental Genetics (Evo-Devo)
- Animal Systematics
Background:
- Eyespots are recurring wing patterns in butterflies, crucial for species recognition and defense.
- The genus Bicyclus exhibits conserved eyespot developmental processes across its diverse species.
- Understanding the genetic and developmental basis of eyespot variation is key to explaining butterfly diversity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the flexibility of butterfly eyespot evolution under artificial selection.
- To compare the evolvability of eyespot size versus eyespot color composition.
- To link genetic and developmental mechanisms to observed patterns of diversity in Bicyclus butterflies.
Main Methods:
- Artificial selection experiments on Bicyclus anynana butterfly eyespot size and color.
- Quantification of phenotypic variation and response to selection over 25 generations.
- Comparative analysis of developmental regulation and genetic variation for different eyespot traits.
Main Results:
- Eyespot size demonstrated high evolvability, with selection yielding phenotypes beyond natural variation.
- Eyespot color composition showed limited flexibility, primarily evolving along a constrained 'axis of least resistance'.
- Significant differences in developmental regulation and genetic variation underlie the distinct evolvability of size and color.
Conclusions:
- Evolvability of butterfly eyespots is trait-dependent, with size being more labile than color.
- Developmental constraints and genetic architecture differentially influence the evolutionary trajectories of morphological traits.
- Understanding trait-specific evolvability is critical for explaining macroevolutionary patterns and biodiversity.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Genetics of Speciation
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.The genetics of speciation involves the different traits or isolating mechanisms preventing gene exchange, leading to reproductive isolation. Reproductive isolation can be due to reproductive barriers that have effects either before or after the formation of a zygote. Pre-zygotic mechanisms prevent fertilization from occurring, and post-zygotic mechanisms...
Limits to Natural Selection
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Position-effect Variegation
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
Speciation Rates
Speciation can proceed at markedly different rates, and evolutionary biologists commonly describe these differences through the models of gradualism and punctuated equilibrium. Both patterns explain how new species arise, but they differ in the tempo and continuity of evolutionary change. In both cases, evolutionary change arises from heritable variation within populations, with natural selection often shaping traits that improve survival and reproduction under specific environmental conditions.

