Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.

Andrew J Tomarken1, Niels G Waller

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. andrew.j.tomarke@vanderbilt.edu

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
|August 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial ability.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

How to Get MAD: Generating Uniformly Sampled Correlation Matrices with a Fixed Mean Absolute Discrepancy.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

Rotation Local Solutions in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Make Some Noise: Generating Data from Imperfect Factor Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2024
Same author

Effects of exposure to erotica on disgust: A preliminary test among contamination-fearful individuals.

Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders·2024
Same author

Local Minima in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2023
Same journal

Mental Health in College Students: From Epidemiological Findings to Sustainable Policies.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Sex Differences in Affective Disorders: A Developmental Neuroscience Framework on the Role of Puberty.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Interpersonal Psychotherapy for the Treatment of Depression Among Adults and Adolescents.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Body-Focused Repetitive Behavior Disorders: From Competing Paradigms Toward Iterative Integration.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Assessment and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in the Community.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Objective Assessment in Clinical Psychological Science: Progress in Wearable Alcohol Biosensors.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2026
See all related articles

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) offers powerful data analysis capabilities, but understanding its limitations is crucial for clinical scientists. This review balances SEM

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is a widely adopted data analysis technique in clinical science.
  • A comprehensive understanding of SEM's strengths and limitations is essential for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a balanced perspective on the strengths and limitations of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
  • To highlight recent innovations and address common misconceptions associated with SEM.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
  • Focus on recent advancements such as latent growth modeling and multilevel SEM.
  • Discussion of methods for handling missing data and non-normality assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • SEM has evolved into a flexible framework with unique capabilities, including latent growth and multilevel models.
  • Key limitations include omitted variables, issues with model components, and potential misinterpretation of well-fitting models.
  • Commonly used rules of thumb may be inaccurate, emphasizing the importance of study design.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical scientists should be aware of SEM's potential pitfalls, such as omitted variables and reliance on potentially inaccurate heuristics.
  • Recommendations are provided for conducting SEM analyses and reporting results responsibly.
  • A nuanced understanding of SEM, beyond its statistical fit, is vital for robust clinical research.