Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics in nanomedicine.

David B Resnik1, Sally S Tinkle

  • 1National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. resnikd@niehs.nih.gov

Nanomedicine (London, England)
|August 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part One.

Biological theory·2026
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part Two.

Biological theory·2026
Same author

Assessing the Environmental Risks of Health Research Leads to Problematic Mission Creep for Ethics Committees.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Conflicts of Interest, Funding Support, and Author Affiliation in Peer-Reviewed Research on the Relationship between Climate Change and Geophysical Characteristics of Hurricanes.

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society·2026
Same author

The Vicious Spiral of AI Slop: Uncurated machine-generated content threatens research integrity and trust in science, ultimately harming all of us.

American scientist·2026
Same author

Transparent Journal Review of Dual Use Research of Concern.

Health security·2026

Nanomedicine advances rapidly, but ethical, social, and regulatory frameworks lag behind. Proactive consideration of these issues is crucial for responsible development and public trust in nanotechnology.

Area of Science:

  • Nanomedicine
  • Biotechnology
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Nanomedicine technology is advancing rapidly.
  • Current ethical, legal, and policy frameworks struggle to keep pace with nanomedicine development.
  • Addressing these aspects proactively is vital to mitigate environmental and public health risks and prevent public backlash.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the ethical, social, and regulatory challenges posed by nanomedicine.
  • To emphasize the need for proactive strategies in risk assessment, management, and communication of engineered nanomaterials.
  • To discuss emerging concerns including social justice, healthcare access, and enhancement applications of nanotechnology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current ethical, social, and regulatory landscapes in nanomedicine.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of risk assessment and management strategies for engineered nanomaterials.
  • Discussion of uncertainties in human subject exposure during clinical trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant ethical, social, and regulatory gaps exist in nanomedicine.
    • Risk assessment and management of engineered nanomaterials present key challenges.
    • Uncertainties persist regarding human exposure to nanomedicine products even after initial clinical trials.
    • Emerging concerns include social justice, healthcare equity, and enhancement uses of nanotechnology.

    Conclusions:

    • Proactive engagement with ethical, social, and regulatory issues is essential for responsible nanomedicine innovation.
    • Robust risk assessment, management, and communication strategies are needed for engineered nanomaterials.
    • Ongoing ethical deliberation is required to address societal implications like access and enhancement.