Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT
Hatem Alkadhi1, Lotus Desbiolles, Lars Husmann
1Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, and Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. hatem.alkadhi@usz.ch
Insights
64-section computed tomography (CT) accurately assesses aortic regurgitation (AR) by measuring regurgitant orifice area, showing results comparable to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). This CT method offers reliable diagnostic accuracy for AR severity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Radiology
- Cardiac Diagnostics
Background:
- Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a significant valvular heart disease.
- Accurate assessment of AR severity is crucial for patient management.
- Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the current standard for AR evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-section computed tomography (CT) for assessing aortic regurgitation (AR).
- To compare CT-derived measurements with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as the reference standard.
- To determine the correlation between CT measurements and AR severity classified by TTE.
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients with AR underwent both TTE and electrocardiographically gated 64-section CT.
- CT data were reconstructed to measure the maximum regurgitant orifice area (ROA) in diastole.
- CT measurements were compared with semiquantitative TTE classification using correlation and ROC analyses.
Main Results:
- A strong correlation (r=0.84) was found between CT-measured ROA and TTE-based AR severity.
- CT demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating AR degrees using specific ROA cutoffs (25 mm² and 75 mm²).
- CT measurements of aortic dimensions and left ventricular parameters correlated well with TTE findings.
Conclusions:
- 64-section CT provides diagnostic accuracy for assessing aortic regurgitation (AR) that is similar to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
- CT is a valuable tool for evaluating AR severity and associated cardiac dimensions.
- The findings support the use of 64-section CT in the comprehensive assessment of patients with AR.
Purpose:
To prospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy of 64-section computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR), with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as reference.
Materials And Methods:
The institutional review board approved this study; written informed consent was obtained. Thirty patients (23 men, seven women; mean age, 56.6 years) with AR underwent TTE and retrospective electrocardiographically gated 64-section CT. CT data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 40% to 90% of R-R interval for analysis. Maximum regurgitant orifice area (ROA) in diastole was planimetrically measured with CT, and measurements were compared with semiquantitative classification with TTE (Spearman rank order correlation coefficients). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for differentiation between degrees of AR with ROA measurements. Dimensions of the aortic root and left ventricular parameters were compared (Pearson correlation analysis).
Results:
A significant correlation was observed between CT planimetric size of ROA (mean, 62 mm2+/-63 [standard deviation]; range, 6-224 mm2) and TTE classification of mild, moderate, and severe AR (r=0.84, P<.001). With ROC analysis, discrimination between degrees of AR with CT was highly accurate when cutoff ROAs (25 mm2 and 75 mm2) were used. A significant correlation was observed between methods in dimensions of aortic annulus (mean, 29.0 mm+/-4.6), sinus of Valsalva (mean, 38.3 mm+/-8.6), and ascending aorta (mean, 37.2 mm+/-8.0); mean values were 27.4 mm+/-4.9 (r=0.76, P<.001), 37.7 mm+/-8.6 (r=0.94, P<.001), and 38.2 mm+/-7.9 (r=0.96, P<.001), respectively. Mean end-systolic volume (67 mL+/-38), end-diastolic volume (149 mL+/-48), and ejection fraction (57%+/-13) at CT correlated well with mean results at TTE (65 mL+/-36 [r=0.96, P<.001], 140 mL+/-48 [r=0.91, P<.001], 56%+/-13 [r=0.98, P<.001], respectively).
Conclusion:
Results of assessment of AR with 64-section CT are similar to those with TTE.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

