Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

D A Wismeijer1, R van Ee, C J Erkelens

  • 1Helmholtz Institute, Department Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. D.A.Wismeijer@phys.uu.nl

Experimental Brain Research
|August 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution of disparity to the perception of 3D shape as revealed by bistability of stereoscopic Necker cubes.

Seeing and perceiving·2013
Same author

United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2012
Same author

Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements.

Journal of vision·2010
Same author

Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in visual rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases.

Brain research·2008
Same author

Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.

Journal of vision·2008
Same author

Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model.

Journal of vision·2007
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Vergence eye movements during saccades are primarily driven by binocular disparity cues, not the perceived surface orientation. Perspective cues also influence vergence, indicating depth cues govern eye movements.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Perception

Background:

  • The relationship between perceived surface orientation and vergence eye movements during saccades is not fully understood.
  • Ambiguous visual stimuli, like slant rivalry, allow for the dissociation of physical cues from perceived orientation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how perceived surface orientation influences vergence eye movements accompanying saccades.
  • To determine the relative contributions of disparity and perspective cues in governing vergence responses.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a slant rivalry stimulus to create conflicting surface orientation cues from perspective and disparity.
  • Instructed subjects to make saccades across the perceived slanted surface while voluntarily controlling their perceptual state.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recorded vergence eye movements and compared them to predicted responses based on disparity and perspective cues.

    • Main Results:

    • Vergence responses closely matched predictions based on disparity cues, regardless of the subject's perceived orientation.
    • Perspective cues demonstrated an influence on vergence when compared to an unambiguous stimulus condition.
    • Depth cues, rather than the subjective perception of depth, were found to govern vergence.

    Conclusions:

    • Vergence eye movements accompanying saccades are predominantly controlled by binocular disparity.
    • Perspective cues also play a role in modulating vergence responses.
    • The study highlights that objective depth cues, not subjective perception, dictate vergence behavior.