On "bettering humanity" in science and engineering education

Area of Science:

• Philosophy of Science
• Ethics in Engineering
• Sociology of Technology

Background:

• Current discourse posits "bettering humanity" as the primary objective for all human endeavors, including science and engineering.
• This perspective is exemplified by arguments from scholars like Krishnasamy Selvan, who also emphasize the history of science and measurement uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

• To respectfully challenge the prevailing notion that "bettering humanity" should be the primary objective of scientific and engineering endeavors.
• To propose that individual betterment should precede collective betterment as the main goal.
• To highlight the lack of a unified theory for "betterment of humanity" and the absence of a single authoritative field.

Main Methods:

• Philosophical argumentation and critical analysis of existing viewpoints.
• Deconstruction of the concept of "bettering humanity."
• Exploration of the implications of prioritizing individual betterment.

Main Results:

• The concept of "bettering humanity" is ill-defined, lacking a unified theory or a universally accepted framework.
• No single field (science, engineering, or philosophy) possesses the sole authority to define or dictate collective betterment.
• Prioritizing individual betterment offers a more attainable and philosophically sound foundation for human endeavors.

Conclusions:

• Human endeavors, including science and engineering, should prioritize individual betterment over the ambiguous goal of collective betterment.
• A focus on "tending their own gardens" by theorists in various fields may indirectly contribute to the common good.
• Rethinking the primary objectives of science and engineering is crucial for meaningful progress.