Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

barbieQ: an R software package for analysing barcode count data from clonal tracking experiments.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

The roles of the acetyltransferase domains of the chromatin regulators KAT6A and KAT6B in vivo.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

KAT6A is essential for developmental control gene expression in neural stem and progenitor cells.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

Single-cell profiling of BAL in preschool cystic fibrosis reveals macrophage dysregulation and ivacaftor-modified inflammatory programs in the early life lung.

Mucosal immunology·2026
Same author

Spinal infection: an evolving clinical and public health challenge.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2026
Same author

Acetyl-carnitine improves hyperactivity and learning deficits in <i>KAT6A</i> haploinsufficient mice.

Life science alliance·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon
08:18

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon

Published on: June 16, 2020

A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays.

Matthew E Ritchie1, Jeremy Silver, Alicia Oshlack

  • 1Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, CRUK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|August 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study compares microarray background correction methods to improve differential gene expression analysis. The normexp+offset method demonstrated the lowest false discovery rate, outperforming others for small experiments.

More Related Videos

Excitation-Scanning Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy to Efficiently Discriminate Fluorescence Signals
07:34

Excitation-Scanning Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy to Efficiently Discriminate Fluorescence Signals

Published on: August 22, 2019

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon
08:18

High-Accuracy Correction of 3D Chromatic Shifts in the Age of Super-Resolution Biological Imaging Using Chromagnon

Published on: June 16, 2020

Excitation-Scanning Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy to Efficiently Discriminate Fluorescence Signals
07:34

Excitation-Scanning Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy to Efficiently Discriminate Fluorescence Signals

Published on: August 22, 2019

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical analysis

Background:

  • Microarray data requires background correction to mitigate biases like non-specific binding and spatial heterogeneity.
  • Standard correction methods can introduce issues such as negative intensities and high log-ratio variability.
  • Optimizing background correction is crucial for accurate differential expression analysis, especially in small-scale experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare various background correction methods for microarray data.
  • To identify the most effective method for differential expression analysis in small microarray experiments.
  • To introduce and assess a novel background processing method based on a convolution model.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of eight background correction alternatives using data with known gene expression levels.
  • Evaluation based on precision, bias, and detection of differentially expressed genes using SAM and limma eBayes algorithms.
  • Introduction and application of the normexp (convolution model-based) background processing method.

Main Results:

  • Model-based background correction methods significantly outperform simple local background subtraction.
  • Methods that stabilize log-ratio variances across intensity ranges show superior performance.
  • The normexp+offset method achieved the lowest false discovery rate, followed by morph and vsn.
  • The normexp method, similar to vsn, is suitable for various two-colour microarray data types.

Conclusions:

  • The normexp+offset method is recommended for background correction in small microarray experiments due to its low false discovery rate.
  • Model-based approaches, particularly those stabilizing variances, offer substantial improvements over traditional methods.
  • The normexp method provides a robust and broadly applicable solution for microarray data processing.