Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.

Stéphanie Gicquel1, Roland Marion-Gallois

  • 1Effi-Stat, 15 rue du Louvre, F-75001 Paris, France. stephanie.gicquel@effi-stat.com

Statistics in Medicine
|August 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Propensity score matching and stratification using multiparty data without pooling.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2022
Same author

Improved survival with enasidenib versus standard of care in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia associated with IDH2 mutations using historical data and propensity score matching analysis.

Cancer medicine·2021
Same author

Heart failure care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS medicine·2014
See all related articles

A new adaptive randomization method, "randomization with a posteriori constraints," balances patient groups for clinical trials. It offers a compromise between stratification and minimization, especially with numerous prognostic factors.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Design

Background:

  • Randomization is crucial for high-quality clinical trial results.
  • Stratification and minimization are standard methods for balancing prognostic factors.
  • Minimization may compromise blinding and faces regulatory scrutiny.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a novel adaptive randomization procedure: "randomization with a posteriori constraints."
  • Compare this new method against stratification and minimization using simulations.
  • Evaluate the performance of different randomization techniques based on the number of prognostic factors.

Main Methods:

  • Developed "randomization with a posteriori constraints" using a posteriori balance search.
  • Conducted simulations to compare the new method with stratification and minimization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed method performance based on the number of prognostic factors and resulting group balance.

    • Main Results:

    • For few prognostic factors, stratification is suitable and simple; minimization or the new method offer little advantage.
    • With numerous prognostic factors, "randomization with a posteriori constraints" shows lower imbalance risk than stratification.
    • The new method is less predictable than minimization but provides better balance than stratification with many factors.

    Conclusions:

    • "Randomization with a posteriori constraints" is a viable alternative to stratification and minimization.
    • The new method offers a good compromise, particularly in trials with multiple prognostic factors.
    • An adequate threshold for the new method ensures effective balance while mitigating bias.