Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Implantation Protocol of the Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body for Complex Vitreoretinal Surgery
Published on: April 14, 2026
Partially capitated managed care versus FFS for special needs children
Cynthia R Schuster1, Jean M Mitchell, Darrell J Gaskin
1The RAND Corporation, USA.
Insights
Medicaid managed care plans with case management improve access to essential therapies for children with special health care needs. Children in these plans receive more school-based occupational and physical therapy compared to fee-for-service.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Pediatric Health Policy
- Managed Care Effectiveness
Background:
- Limited research exists on the effectiveness of Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) with case management for coordinating services for children with special health care needs (CSHCN).
- Understanding service utilization patterns is crucial for optimizing care delivery for CSHCN.
- The role of case management within MCPs in facilitating access to therapeutic services requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of enrolling CSHCN in a partially capitated MCP with case management versus a fee-for-service (FFS) model.
- To compare the utilization of speech, occupational, and physical therapy services based on the site of service (school vs. health care sector).
- To identify potential disparities in therapeutic service access between different Medicaid coverage models.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of therapeutic service utilization among CSHCN enrolled in a partially capitated MCP with case management and those in a FFS plan.
- Examination of service use by specific therapy type (speech, occupational, physical) and by service delivery sector (school-based vs. health care sector).
- Statistical comparison of service utilization rates between the two enrollment models.
Main Results:
- Children with special health care needs enrolled in the partially capitated MCP were significantly more likely to receive occupational and physical therapy in the school setting compared to FFS enrollees.
- Children enrolled in FFS were significantly less likely to be regular or frequent users of all examined therapeutic services compared to those in managed care.
- Case management within the MCP appears to facilitate greater access to school-based therapeutic services for CSHCN.
Conclusions:
- Partially capitated Medicaid managed care plans incorporating case management demonstrate effectiveness in coordinating and increasing the utilization of therapeutic services for CSHCN, particularly in school settings.
- Enrollment in FFS plans is associated with reduced access to regular and frequent therapeutic services for CSHCN.
- The findings underscore the importance of integrated case management within managed care for improving access to essential therapies for children with special health care needs.
Abstract:
Little research has examined whether Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) that incorporate case management are effective in coordinating services for children with special health care needs (CSHCN). This study evaluates the effects of enrollment of special needs children into a partially capitated MCP (with ongoing case management) versus the fee-for-service (FFS) option on use of therapeutic services, specifically speech, occupational, and physical therapy by site of service (school versus health care sector). Results show that special needs children enrolled in the partially capitated MCP are significantly more likely to obtain occupational and physical therapy at school relative to their FFS counterparts. Moreover, children enrolled in FFS are significantly less likely to be either regular or frequent users of each type of therapy relative to children enrolled in managed care. We attribute much of these disparities in use of therapeutic services at school to the availability of case management and coordination that is an integral component of the partially capitated MCP.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I