Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Obesity prevention programs demand high-quality evaluations.

Boyd Swinburn1, Colin Bell, Lesley King

  • 1WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Faculty of Health, Medicine, Nursing, and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria. boyd.swinburn@deakin.edu.au

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
|August 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Obesity has risen in all countries - but at a faster pace in poorer ones.

Nature·2026
Same author

Rice and beans: the nutritious, sustainable and affordable staple of the Brazilian diet.

Public health nutrition·2026
Same author

Prioritising Indicators for Large-scale Monitoring and Assessment of Food Environments for Public Health.

Current obesity reports·2026
Same author

How Does the Ultra-Processed Food Industry Drive Consumption Through Product Design and Marketing? Mapping a Complex Commercial System According to Expert Mental Models and Evidence Review.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2026
Same author

Rangatahi Youth-Led Dissemination Campaign for Cocreated Eating and Well-Being Guidelines: Process and Pilot Implementation Evaluation.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Sonographic assessment of fasting: emergency room sedations.

CJEM·2026
Same journal

The costs of diagnosing and treating skin cancer: Findings from the QSkin Study.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Australians' experiences with vaping after the implementation of vape reforms: A qualitative study.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

What's in the Box? Analysis of the nutritional content and adoption of Health Star Ratings among packaged lunchbox snacks released in Australia: 2013-2024.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Public Health at Risk: Insights from the 2026 Communicable Disease and Immunisation Conference.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The potential for adverse events or harms are not routinely assessed or reported in evaluations of public health interventions.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Social connection: The new frontier for better health in 2026.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

Effective obesity prevention programs in Australia and New Zealand require rigorous evaluation. Key evaluation components like comparison groups and accurate measurements are often compromised, hindering evidence-based improvements.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research
  • Obesity Prevention

Background:

  • Obesity prevention programs are being implemented in Australia and New Zealand.
  • Robust evaluation is crucial for program improvement and international evidence generation.
  • Funding models can impact critical evaluation components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of comprehensive evaluation for obesity prevention programs.
  • To identify potential risks to evaluation quality in service-delivery funded programs.
  • To advocate for collaborative mechanisms to enhance evaluation and knowledge translation.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract does not specify methods but discusses critical components of program evaluation.
  • Focuses on the risks to evaluation quality concerning comparison groups, measured height and weight, and process/context information.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasizes the need for collaborative approaches across community-based sites.

    • Main Results:

    • Evaluation of obesity prevention programs faces risks, particularly regarding comparison groups, accurate anthropometric measurements, and detailed process/context data.
    • Service delivery funding, rather than research funding, poses a threat to these critical evaluation elements.
    • There is a significant opportunity for collaboration to improve program and evaluation quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Well-evaluated obesity prevention programs are essential for continuous improvement and evidence-based practice.
    • Attention must be paid to maintaining core evaluation standards, even with service delivery funding.
    • Collaborative networks can strengthen obesity prevention efforts and accelerate the translation of findings into policy and practice.