Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a collaborative research system for Aboriginal health.

Jackie Street1, Fran Baum, Ian Anderson

  • 1Department of Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia. jackie.street@adelaide.edu.au

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
|August 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case Report: Reintroduction of winged infusion sets to needle syringe programs - advancing equity in harm reduction.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Evidence synthesis without equity: a missed opportunity to promote health and improve health care.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Non-governmental organisations and the regulation of harmful commodity industries: navigating global governance to change corporate practices.

Globalization and health·2026
Same author

Logics of (dis)engagement: mapping variation in non-government norms and approaches to alcohol, ultra-processed food and related industries - a case study from Australia.

Globalization and health·2026
Same author

Outreach mpox vaccination at sex-on-premises venues in Sydney: an audit of a collaborative intervention by public health nurses and LGBTQI+ peer workers.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Global population structures and demographic history of <i>Suillus luteus</i> , a pine co-introduced ectomycorrhizal fungus associated with exotic forestry and invasion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

The costs of diagnosing and treating skin cancer: Findings from the QSkin Study.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Australians' experiences with vaping after the implementation of vape reforms: A qualitative study.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

What's in the Box? Analysis of the nutritional content and adoption of Health Star Ratings among packaged lunchbox snacks released in Australia: 2013-2024.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Public Health at Risk: Insights from the 2026 Communicable Disease and Immunisation Conference.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The potential for adverse events or harms are not routinely assessed or reported in evaluations of public health interventions.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Social connection: The new frontier for better health in 2026.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

Stakeholders prefer collaborative research funding over traditional peer review. This shift aims to enhance community involvement and research development, particularly in Indigenous health research.

Area of Science:

  • Community-based participatory research
  • Indigenous health research
  • Research funding models

Background:

  • Investigator-driven research and peer review face challenges in community-based and Indigenous research.
  • Examining existing research funding processes is crucial for improving collaborative practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate stakeholder perspectives on the research funding process within an Australian Aboriginal majority-controlled research-funding organization.
  • To explore alternative models for research funding that promote collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study involving in-depth interviews (n=18) with stakeholders.
  • A steering group guided the research, and findings were iteratively incorporated.
  • A discussion document and literature review informed the interview process.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overwhelming support for a more collaborative research culture was expressed by participants.
  • Suggested changes included grant bodies acting as network brokers and using 'critical friends' instead of blinded peer review.
  • Barriers to implementing a more collaborative research culture were identified.

Conclusions:

  • A collaborative funding structure can redirect resources from peer review to research development.
  • Increased community participation in decision-making within the research funding process is achievable.
  • Adopting collaborative models is essential for effective Indigenous health research.