Frequent plateletpheresis does not clinically significantly decrease platelet counts in donors

Louis Katz1, Kim Palmer, Emily McDonnell

  • 1Mississippi Valley Regional Blood Center, Davenport, Iowa, USA. lkatz@mvrbc.com

Transfusion
|August 30, 2007
PubMed

Insights

Proposed FDA restrictions on platelet (PLT) collections are unnecessary. Frequent PLT donors show no clinically significant PLT count declines, and protein levels remain stable, ensuring apheresis PLT supply.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Transfusion Medicine

Background:

  • US FDA proposed limiting automated platelet (PLT) collections to 24 components annually.
  • Rationale included concerns about frequent PLT collection impacting donor PLT counts.
  • Proposed restrictions also included minimal interdonation intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of proposed FDA restrictions on PLT collections.
  • To evaluate the effect of collection frequency, number of products, and interdonation interval on donor PLT counts.
  • To compare protein and albumin levels in frequent PLT donors versus control donors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of plateletpheresis records with predonation PLT counts.
  • Review of donor PLT counts in relation to collection frequency and interdonation intervals.
  • Comparison of total protein and albumin levels between frequent PLT donors and whole-blood donors.

Main Results:

  • A 24-component limit would necessitate replacing ~20% of donors to maintain supply.
  • No clinically significant decrease in donor PLT counts was observed up to 24 collections/year.
  • Frequent donors were not deferred for low PLT counts; protein levels were comparable to controls.

Conclusions:

  • Proposed FDA restrictions on PLT collections are not needed to prevent thrombocytopenia in frequent donors.
  • Restrictions would negatively impact the apheresis PLT supply.
  • High-frequency PLT donors maintain adequate protein levels.
Abstract