Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
The impact of FDA and EMEA guidelines on drug development in relation to Phase 0 trials
1Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
An increase in the number of identified therapeutic cancer targets achieved through recent biomedical research has resulted in the generation of a large number of molecules that need to be tested further. Current development of (anticancer) drugs is a rather inefficient process that for an average new molecule takes around 10-15 years. It is also a challenging process as it is associated with high costs and a low rate of approval. It is known that less than 10% of new molecular entities entering clinical Phase I testing progress beyond the investigational programme and reach the market; this probability is even lower for anticancer agents. In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) declared the urgent need for new toolkits to improve the critical development path that leads from scientific discovery to the patient. In this scenario, Phase 0 (zero) trials should allow an early evaluation in humans of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of test compounds through administration of sub-pharmacological doses and for a short time period to a low number of humans. Typically, Phase 0 studies have no therapeutic or diagnostic intent. Owing to the low doses administered and the low risk of toxicity, shorter preclinical packages to support these studies are required. Phase 0 trials have been proposed to help in making an early selection of promising candidates for further evaluation in Phase I-III trials, providing a potentially useful instrument for drug discovery, particularly in the field of oncology. Phase 0 studies are expected to reduce costs of drug development, and to limit the preclinical in vitro and in vivo testing and the time period of drug development. However, there are also concerns about the utility and feasibility of Phase 0 studies. In January 2006, guidelines on exploratory investigational new drug studies in humans have been published by the US FDA, and currently a Phase 0 programme is ongoing at the National Cancer Institute to evaluate the impact (feasibility and utility) of Phase 0 studies on drug development. In Europe, a Position Paper produced by the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) in 2004 raised the possibility of a reduced preclinical safety package to support early microdose clinical studies, and, as announced by a recent Concept Paper on medicinal products published by the committee for medicinal products for human use of the EMEA, EMEA's guidelines on Phase 0 studies are expected shortly. The true impact of Phase 0 studies on the drug development process as well as on the safety needs to be carefully explored.
Insights
Phase 0 trials offer early human evaluation of drug candidates using sub-therapeutic doses, potentially streamlining cancer drug development. These exploratory studies aim to improve efficiency and reduce costs, though their utility requires further exploration.
Area of Science:
- * Oncology
- * Pharmacology
- * Drug Development
Background:
- * The drug development process is lengthy, costly, and has a low success rate, especially for anticancer agents.
- * The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified a need for improved drug development tools in 2003.
- * Biomedical research has increased the number of potential cancer drug molecules requiring testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To introduce Phase 0 trials as a novel approach for early human evaluation of drug candidates.
- * To assess the potential of Phase 0 trials in improving the efficiency and reducing the cost of drug development, particularly in oncology.
- * To address concerns regarding the utility and feasibility of Phase 0 studies.
Main Methods:
- * Phase 0 trials involve administering sub-pharmacological doses of investigational drugs to a small number of humans for a short duration.
- * These studies focus on evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles without therapeutic intent.
- * Reduced preclinical testing packages are proposed to support Phase 0 studies due to low doses and minimal toxicity risk.
Main Results:
- * Phase 0 trials aim to facilitate early selection of promising drug candidates for subsequent clinical phases (I-III).
- * Expected benefits include reduced drug development costs and timelines, with less extensive in vitro and in vivo preclinical testing.
- * Ongoing evaluations by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and anticipated guidelines from the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) are assessing the impact of Phase 0 studies.
Conclusions:
- * Phase 0 trials represent a potential paradigm shift in early-stage drug development, offering an efficient screening mechanism.
- * The successful integration of Phase 0 studies could significantly accelerate the delivery of novel anticancer therapies to patients.
- * Further research is crucial to fully understand the impact and optimize the implementation of Phase 0 studies in the drug development pipeline.
More Related Videos
07:43A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears
Published on: July 14, 2023
08:47Experimental Quantification of Interactions Between Drug Delivery Systems and Cells In Vitro: A Guide for Preclinical Nanomedicine Evaluation
Published on: September 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drug Regulation
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions