Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do "mudsplashes" induce tactile change blindness?

Alberto Gallace1, Hong Z Tan, Charles Spence

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. alberto.gallace@psy.ox.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shifting the body midline: The impact of visuomotor modulations in virtual reality on peripheral autonomic activity.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Human bodies in virtual worlds: a systematic review of implicit sense of agency and ownership measured in immersive virtual reality environments.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Spatial sensorimotor mismatch increases the excitability of the primary somatosensory cortex: Insight from an EEG-virtual reality study.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Comparing the effectiveness of virtual reality vs 2D display-based cue reactivity paradigms to induce nicotine-craving: a behavioral and psychophysiological study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Spatial sensorimotor mismatch between the motor command and somatosensory feedback decreases motor cortical excitability. A transcranial magnetic stimulation-virtual reality study.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Exploring virtual reality object perception following sensory-motor interactions with different visuo-haptic collider properties.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

People often miss changes in tactile displays, a phenomenon known as change blindness. This study shows tactile change blindness occurs even with distractions, suggesting a limit on conscious awareness of spatial information.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Change blindness, the failure to notice significant changes in visual stimuli, is well-documented.
  • Recent research indicates change blindness also occurs in tactile perception, specifically for positional changes.
  • This study investigates change blindness related to the number of tactile stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine change blindness in tactile perception concerning the number of stimuli.
  • To determine if tactile change blindness is influenced by masking or distractor stimuli.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms limiting tactile change detection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants detected changes in the number of tactile stimuli (1-3) across successively presented displays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1 employed a tactile mask (simultaneous activation of all stimulators) between displays.
  • Experiment 2 used a "mudsplash" paradigm with brief tactile distractors during display changes.

    • Main Results:

    • Change blindness was observed in both experimental conditions, demonstrating robust tactile change blindness.
    • The results indicate that physical disruption, masking, or information resetting are not solely responsible for tactile change blindness.
    • Tactile change detection was impaired, suggesting a general limitation in processing spatial information.

    Conclusions:

    • Tactile change blindness is a significant phenomenon, extending beyond visual perception.
    • The findings suggest a fundamental cognitive limitation in the conscious processing of spatial information across sensory modalities.
    • This limitation likely constrains the ability to detect changes in both visual and tactile environments.