Natural philosophy in the constitution

Area of Science:

• Science and Technology Policy
• Higher Education Research
• Government Relations

Background:

• Historically, scientific advancement was viewed as a core aspect of citizen sovereignty in the U.S.
• Universities were established as centers for this scientific pursuit and sovereignty.
• Contemporary institutions are increasingly seen as contract research centers for the federal government.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the evolving relationship between federal government and university science.
• To address the ethical and practical implications of research contracts, particularly in defense initiatives.
• To advocate for a reconstruction of this relationship in alignment with original social contract principles.

Main Methods:

• Historical analysis of the U.S. social contract and its relation to science.
• Examination of the role of universities as centers of scientific inquiry and sovereignty.
• Critique of current federal research funding models, specifically defense-related contracts.

Main Results:

• The initial vision of science as citizen sovereignty has shifted towards universities serving as federal research contractors.
• There is significant scientific community consensus against the technical feasibility of initiatives like the Strategic Defense Initiative.
• Current practices strain the relationship between government and university science.

Conclusions:

• The current model of federal-university science collaboration, particularly concerning defense contracts, is misaligned with foundational principles.
• A re-evaluation and reconstruction of the federal government's relationship with university science are necessary.
• Restoring the spirit of the social contract is essential for the healthy advancement of science.