Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of procedures for improving population estimates for small areas.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·1991
Same author

Some coverage error models for census data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·1986
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Fast Colony Forming Unit Counting in 96-Well Plate Format Applied to the Drosophila Microbiome
12:55

Fast Colony Forming Unit Counting in 96-Well Plate Format Applied to the Drosophila Microbiome

Published on: January 13, 2023

Accounting for America's Uncounted and Miscounted

K M Wolter

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |July 5, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary

    No abstract available in PubMed .

    More Related Videos

    Determining Cell Number During Cell Culture using the Scepter Cell Counter
    09:33

    Determining Cell Number During Cell Culture using the Scepter Cell Counter

    Published on: November 26, 2010

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
    11:01

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

    Published on: November 17, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

    Fast Colony Forming Unit Counting in 96-Well Plate Format Applied to the Drosophila Microbiome
    12:55

    Fast Colony Forming Unit Counting in 96-Well Plate Format Applied to the Drosophila Microbiome

    Published on: January 13, 2023

    Determining Cell Number During Cell Culture using the Scepter Cell Counter
    09:33

    Determining Cell Number During Cell Culture using the Scepter Cell Counter

    Published on: November 26, 2010

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
    11:01

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

    Published on: November 17, 2016