Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: how far have we gone?

Günter Janetschek1

  • 1Department of Urology, Elisabethinen Hospital, Linz, Austria. guenter.janetschek@elisabethinen.or.at

Current Opinion in Urology
|September 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum re "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Males: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study" [Eur Urol 2009;56:418-24].

European urology·2020
Same author

Early sacral neuromodulation ameliorates urinary bladder function and structure in complete spinal cord injury minipigs.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2019
Same author

Standardized and Validated Training Programs for Robot-assisted Laparoscopy: The Challenge of the Future.

European urology·2019
Same author

Non-ischemic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using 1318-nm diode laser for small exophytic renal tumors.

BMC urology·2018
Same author

Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy.

Journal of endourology·2018
Same author

A new technique for minimal invasive complete spinal cord injury in minipigs.

Acta neurochirurgica·2018
Same journal

Role and relevance of genetic testing in patients with kidney stones: a review from EAU Section of Endourology.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Advances in evaluating and delivering nontechnical skills training: The use of simulation, robotics, artificial intelligence and virtual reality.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Educating for a sustainable future: faculty and student perspectives and a review of environmental sustainability in medical education - an EAU endourology study.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Shaping the future of endourology: role of education, simulation and uro-technology: a scoping review by the EAU Section of Endourology.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

A review of emerging technologies and techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy access.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in kidney cancer: a review of clinical applications across the disease spectrum.

Current opinion in urology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy offers excellent oncologic and functional outcomes comparable to open surgery. While technically demanding, this minimally invasive approach is gaining traction due to patient benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Technical modifications have improved laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).
  • Focus on reducing complications and warm ischemia time.
  • Review of recent advancements and outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent results of LPN.
  • Focus on oncologic outcomes and postoperative renal function.
  • Evaluate LPN's efficacy and safety.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature and published data on LPN.
  • Comparison of LPN with open partial nephrectomy.
  • Analysis of complication rates, oncologic outcomes, and functional results.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • LPN indications are similar to open surgery; suitable for tumors up to 7 cm.
  • Low complication rates in experienced hands.
  • Oncologic outcomes comparable to open surgery; excellent functional results.
  • Potential for lower patient costs.

Conclusions:

  • LPN standardizes open surgery principles but remains technically challenging.
  • Growing interest from urologists and patients.
  • Not yet standard of care, but excellent results reported by experienced surgeons.