Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Prevalence of white coat hypertension in primary health care
Leila Maria Marchi Alves1, Maria Suely Nogueira, Simone de Godoy
1Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. lmarchi@eerp.usp.br
Insights
White coat hypertension affects 34.1% of individuals in Dumont, São Paulo. This condition, characterized by elevated blood pressure in clinical settings, shows distinct physiological and metabolic changes compared to normotensive and essential hypertensive individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Public Health
- Clinical Hypertension
Background:
- White coat hypertension (WCH) is a phenomenon where blood pressure is elevated in a clinical setting but normal in ambulatory or home readings.
- Understanding the prevalence and characteristics of WCH is crucial for accurate diagnosis and management of hypertension.
- The municipality of Dumont in São Paulo State serves as the study area for this investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) within the population of Dumont, São Paulo State.
- To characterize the demographic, physiological, and metabolic profiles of individuals with WCH.
- To compare these characteristics with those of normotensive and essential hypertensive individuals.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 109 participants from the Municipal Health Service in Dumont was selected.
- Participants were categorized into normotension, essential hypertension, and WCH groups based on blood pressure monitoring.
- Data collection involved interviews, measurements, and laboratory exams, with statistical analysis using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Main Results:
- The prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) was found to be 34.1%.
- Females predominated in the WCH group, with a mean age of 45.3 years.
- Individuals with WCH exhibited increased body mass index, waist/hip ratio, plasma glucose, and creatinine levels compared to other groups.
Conclusions:
- White coat hypertension (WCH) presents with distinct clinical and biochemical variations compared to normotension and essential hypertension.
- These findings underscore the importance of differentiating WCH from sustained hypertension for appropriate patient management.
- Further investigation into WCH is warranted, considering its unique characteristics in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals.
Objective:
Assess the prevalence of white coat hypertension in the municipality of Dumont, in São Paulo State, and map study participants' demographics, and physiologic and metabolic changes.
Methods:
One hundred and nine (109) users of the Municipal Health Service were selected and then divided into three groups: normotension, essential hypertension, and white coat hypertension after blood pressure was measured through oscilometry and blood pressure monitoring exam at outpatient unit. Variables found between the groups were compared based on interview, data measurements, and laboratory exams. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for statistical data. Results were expressed as means +/- standard error of means. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
The prevalence of white coat hypertension was 34.1%. Females were predominant: mean age 45.3 years, increased body mass index, waist/hip ratio, plasma glucose level and creatinine when compared to hypertensives and/or normotensives. No correlation was found between white coat hypertension and demographic variables.
Conclusion:
The differences found between the groups and clinical and biochemical variations lead to the conclusion that white coat hypertension is a condition that should be investigated in normotensive and hypertensive individuals distinctively.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology